After almost 10 years, the attempts to engineer the return of the Republic of China to the UN have produced no results. Against this background, the government's proposal that it apply for UN membership using the name "Taiwan" represents a flexible approach to dealing with a dead-end situation.
It avoids the issue of the right to represent China as well as the possibility to reject the application based on UN Resolution 2758.
Since that resolution does not deal with the issue of Taiwan's sovereignty, "Taiwan" is a new issue for the UN.
The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) proposed referendum on joining the UN seeks to highlight Taiwan's sovereignty and allows the public to directly express their wish to join the organization.
Not only does this conform to the fundamental UN policy of self determination and lay a solid foundation for joining the UN, it also avoids the issue of a referendum on Taiwanese independence and directly revealing the government's bottom line to the US and China.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), however, immediately issued a counterproposal: A referendum on returning to the UN, without denying that it was based purely on concern about the presidential election. Indeed, in addition to "Republic of China, the name "Taiwan" is also considered as an option in the referendum, a bid by the KMT to appeal to as many voters as possible.
Leaving the issue of the presidential election aside, the fact is that the referendum on returning to the UN is a reflection of the flexible diplomacy that former president Lee Teng-hui (
Should the KMT and the DPP urge their supporters to oppose the other party's referendum, it is very likely that neither will pass, an outcome that would cause great harm to Taiwan. Some people therefore advocate that the two referendums be merged, while others say that we should vote in favor of both referendums.
There are even KMT forces in the legislature working to merge the two into a third referendum, or to issue a resolution instead of pushing for a third referendum.
Unfortunately, hawks within the KMT will oppose anything including the name "Taiwan" or the word "referendum" and they are instead proposing that voters abstain from voting altogether.
Conservatives are suspicious of the name "Taiwan" and oppose the DPP referendum while remaining cautious on the KMT referendum to return to the UN. Pro-localization or reform-minded forces, for their part, support either the original KMT referendum, a third referendum or a resolution.
Because everyone insists on his or her own preferences, a lot of debate is going on and even top party officials seem to be at a loss as to what to do.
The election campaign is in full swing and the KMT is following up its massive victory in the legislative elections by calling for a united government. Despite this, the party remains unable to decide how to deal with the referendum proposed by the party itself and it lacks a sense of direction, if not the ability to unite. Where will Taiwan end up if the KMT manages to obtain its united government?
Huang Yu-lin is an associate professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at National Chiao Tung University and a former member of the Cabinet's Referendum Review Committee.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
Beijing’s diplomatic tightening with Jakarta is not an isolated episode; it is a piece of a long-term strategy that realigns the prices of choices across the Indo-Pacific. The principle is simple. There is no need to impose an alliance if one can make a given trajectory convenient and the alternative costly. By tying Indonesia’s modernization to capital, technology and logistics corridors, and by obtaining in public the reaffirmation of the “one China” principle, Beijing builds a constraint that can be activated tomorrow on sensitive issues. The most sensitive is Taiwan. If we look at systemic constraints, the question is not whether
RSS