When Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman Liu Jianchao (
As for the second claim, a more complex question follows: Given Beijing's willingness to use threatening language against Taiwan (officially) and Washington (unofficially, through media outlets and former officials or military figures), why are US-China relations not already being discussed in terms of a new cold war?
The "Cold War" reference is dubious and there are a number of reasons for this. Unlike the Soviet Union at the height of its power, China cannot begin to compete with the US militarily in global terms. But it does wish to compete in -- with a view to dominate -- the region. This is not necessarily interpreted by US politicians as hostile, especially given the mythology that has developed over Chinese history and its entitlement to "great power" status.
The second is that China and the US have an economic and financial relationship that is far more intertwined and sophisticated than the Soviet Union ever experienced with the US.
The third is that the Chinese do not exercise anywhere near the same influence in other countries as the Soviets did and therefore do not pose a corresponding geostrategic threat. Even autocratic countries in the region that have close economic ties with China can hardly be thought of as belonging to a Chinese bloc. And while Beijing is increasingly acting as an imperial power in its domestic governance and its client-patron relations with developing countries, this does not extend to China calling the shots with other governments. If anything, the Chinese prefer to keep a distance -- or at the least, be seen to be doing so.
The fourth is that the balance of popular opinion and political rhetoric in the US does not fully recognize the threat China poses to the US, economically or militarily.
The fifth is that the Chinese have lost all ideological credibility as communists or even socialists. Beijing poses no revolutionary threat to a capitalist superpower because it is adapting as quickly as possible to the parameters of capitalism. Its refusal to simultaneously introduce democratic reform is not in itself considered threatening to other powers, which is partly why interest in the human rights of Chinese at home waxes and wanes with the seasons.
The sixth is that the US and its allies are preoccupied with long-term and dispiriting combat missions in the Middle East. Compared with the "hot war" wastelands of Iraq and Afghanistan, the stalemates in the Palestinian territories and Lebanon and the aggressive language of Tehran and Damascus, the Chinese seem positively polite. With all the "hot wars" that Washington must conduct, a Chinese "Cold War" is hardly a priority.
Lastly, the Chinese have been milking the Korean Peninsula for all it is worth. A Cold War adversary can hardly be described as such when it is a supposed ally in the neutralization of a criminal regime equipped with nuclear technology.
None of this changes the fact that the Chinese, by virtue of their actions and habits, are close to spoiling for a "Cold War." It is simply a function of time, wisdom and inclination as to when the Americans appreciate that a China under Communist Party control cannot take any other route, despite the Orwellian blusterings of its spokesmen.
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
RSS