I was surprised to read the paper's editorial on Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) statements about whether or not he possessed a green card ("Ma's colored leadership card," page 8, Jan. 31). Don't misunderstand: The topic followed nicely on the heels of a news piece you published on the details of this attack strategy by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Nevertheless, based on your insightful opinions in the past, I had fully expected another take on the issue and had turned to the opinion page partly to confirm that I was right.
Apparently I was wrong.
Instead of reading that DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (
Instead of reading that possession of a green card does not equate to lack of loyalty to one's country (which Ma also said), I read about Ma's supposed lack of integrity over the matter.
And instead of reading that Hsieh would have been better off championing Indiana's recent legislative support for democratic Taiwan (admittedly my home state), I read about Ma's so-called image manipulation of the press.
Yes, considering my well-placed confidence in the Taipei Times' editorials, I must have been wrong.
Or was I? I have chosen to reside in a foreign country for a number of years and not out of necessity. Does that indicate a lack of respect for my home country? In a word, no. It does say something good about the people of Taiwan, but not about my respect for the US.
Similarly, possession of a green card implies that -- at least at the time of application -- there was probably something good about the US. Most people love their home country even if they are open to opportunities elsewhere and to suggest otherwise without clear evidence is unjustified and ill-conceived.
How surprising is it really that a foreign student in the US would apply for a green card? I fail to feel the shock. Nearly every week I see a net-based ad offering me green card services. Apparently, a lot of people outside the US have at least some interest. Didn't many Taiwanese students studying in the US at the same time as Ma spend at least a few moments considering whether they should spend the time and money to apply?
In the US presidential election, a few people will try to make an issue out of Senator Barack Obama's admitted brief use of an illegal substance, but will most Americans really care? Or will they be more focused on the hostility in Iraq, health care (or the lack thereof) and the economy? Most likely the latter. So it is surprising to me that so much focus is being spent on Ma's reasonable action to exercise his legal right to apply for a green card while living abroad. Horror of horrors! Of course, if it turns out that he failed to disclose this when legally or morally obliged to do so, then that's perhaps another matter -- but far from earth-shaking.
Your editorial does get it right when you insist that politicians should be held to a high standard of integrity. And telling us that Ma claimed to be "scrupulous in separating public funds from private interests" is certainly of interest, considering how easy it is for so many politicians (no "defense" intended) to fail to "avoid giving even an appearance of evil" when it comes to special allowance funds. But that's another horse to beat on a different day -- one that you have beat quite well in the past, and rightfully so.
Nevertheless, I remain open to any new developments that might raise this matter to the level of an actual issue, for I -- like you -- am hopeful that Taiwan will elect a leader that truly cares about integrity and values liberty at least as much as the economy, if not more so. Of course, there's no telling what skeletons may lie in the candidates' closets, but one thing's for sure: If they're there -- and sometimes even if they're not -- motivated individuals will swing the doors wide open to reveal them, for better or worse.
But, for now at least, I'm inclined to believe that former or current possession of a green card is not such an objectionable thing. It is perhaps even admirable. And I hope that the DPP and this newspaper can get back to focusing on better things at this crucial juncture.
Jim Goodpaster
Taipei
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
RSS