During his 1960 presidential campaign, former US president John F. Kennedy once said: "I'm the only person standing between Richard Nixon and the White House."
In the same vein, numerous Taiwanese believe that the DPP standard bearer Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) is the only person standing between Beijing and Taiwan.
Duplicating the KMT legislative victory in the presidential contest would remove all obstacles for the KMT to bring Taiwan into Beijing's orbit. From Beijing's perspective, the KMT's full control of Taiwan would translate into the elimination of any excuse the KMT has for not complying with Beijing's wishes, given its pact with the Chinese Communist Party.
Stealth unification would be plausible given KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) "neither domestic nor international" but open-border policy to China and his intention to integrate Taiwan's economy with China's as a foot in the door for his and his party's ultimate goal of unifying Taiwan with China.
That would be the case if Beijing is patient.
If it's not, a Beijing-instigated implementation of a KMT version of the "Anti-Secession" Law could destabilize Taiwan for years to come.
This coming election's implication on Taiwan has undoubtedly multiplied on account of the legislative poll's dramatic outcome. People could be choosing between constantly resisting the coercion of Beijing and irreversibly succumbing to it.
The impact on Taiwan's future sovereignty of the two partys' platforms deserves a thorough public airing. Imperative then is a Hsieh-Ma debate on the specific topic of sovereignty.
In the absence of a complete trust and understanding of Ma and the KMT's designs for Taiwan's future, the public might opt for the safe harbor of checks and balances and, as a result, Ma wouldn't get the collective nod.
Ma's loss would, in addition to slowing the momentum of Taiwan's moth-to-fire tilt toward China, provide a reality check to the KMT's party-state fantasy and give KMT legislators pause enough that undemocratic bills like the "money-pit" and the Anti-Secession Law wouldn't see the light of day.
Should voters, seeking balance after drubbing the DPP, swing to the other extreme of the pendulum and decidedly reject Ma with a huge margin, a transformation of the KMT might even follow.
Stunned by the steep reversal of fortune and desperate to exit permanent opposition status, the KMT might decide to shed all election "baggage" and drop its prefix of "Chinese" to become the Taiwanese Nationalist Party for a complete "localization" make-over.
What could materialize is a political landscape with two major Taiwanese parties operating under an equitable political environment free of party assets disparity and systematic one-sided advantage while both vying for the coveted opportunity to serve Taiwan in lieu of foreign interests.
This in turn would ensure national unity as well as the nation's long-term stability, a development that should restore Taiwan's faith in democracy.
The March poll could evolve into an unprecedented opportunity for Taiwanese to right the ship they call home.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS