According to the Code of Criminal Procedure (刑事訴訟法), individuals are entitled have their attorneys present during interrogation, in keeping with the spirit of the presumption of innocence and egalitarianism. Article 154 of the code states that: "Prior to final conviction through trial, an accused is presumed to be innocent."
In other words, until the court has reached its final verdict, every suspect is considered innocent. This is an internationally recognized principle for criminal prosecution.
The principle of egalitarianism is aimed at a balance of legal knowledge between members of the public and the police, prosecution, or judges that represent the public power of the state. Suspects are entitled to an attorney who is equipped with the same professional knowledge of law as their accusers.
To realize the above principles, the Legal Aid Foundation (
The program was implemented in district prosecutors' offices and courts with the support of the Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice. Beginning in mid-October, the program was expanded to provide service 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. This assures that the legally stipulated right to be accompanied by an attorney during interrogations will be realized and that human rights in Taiwan are upheld.
Regrettably, police stations, which play a driving interrogative role in the initial process of investigations, have yet to begin to work with the Legal Aid Foundation. The first step in the interrogation of suspects during an investigation is administered by police before the suspects are moved to prosecutors' offices for further interrogation and possible detention.
Hence, if attorneys were able to accompany suspects during interrogations at police stations, the protection of human rights and the likelihood of uncovering the true facts of a case would be greater. As interrogation is a decisive factor in indictment and subsequent legal procedure, certain long-standing cases are bogged down because of debate concerning the courtroom admissibility of interrogation records. This is not only a waste of legal and societal resources, but also results in the public often distrusting legal verdicts.
Now, after completing the National Police Agency's preparations, training and lectures for law-enforcement officers at the grassroots level, the police will join the program on Friday. From then on, police, prosecution and court interrogations will all be conducted in the presence of a defense attorney. I believe this will elevate protection of the legal rights of the public to a new level.
As the system for attorney accompaniment during interrogation gradually matures, the measures will hopefully not only protect the public's legal rights, but also make significant contributions to ensuring the correctness of legal proceedings, the conserving of trial resources and the establishment of public trust.
Those seeking assistance from the Legal Aid Foundation can call (02) 6632-8282 Monday to Friday during working hours, or (02) 2559-2119 evenings and weekends, to request an attorney.
Ku Den-mei is the chairperson of the Legal Aid Foundation.
Translated by Angela Hong
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS