WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL election but two months away, it remains difficult to determine what political parties will do.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) continues to say what he would do if he became president and will likely continue his down-to-earth meetings with people throughout the nation. This is what a candidate does -- and should do -- to gain the numbers of votes to win an election.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) at this point, has not had the complete support of the leadership in the party, much less that of the many voters who once supported the DPP but did not participate in the Jan. 12 legislative elections. Getting the support of the leadership of a party is crucial.
To gain broad support from both the leadership and the people takes time.
Time, unfortunately, is not on Hsieh's side and it is something he has precious little of.
The electoral battle that is now taking place in the US has similarities: One of the parties seeks to keep the presidency, while the other, the Democrats, has Senator Hillary Clinton, who initially seemed to be the obvious choice, but in a short period of time her lead was no longer assured.
About two months ago, Senator Barack Obama was hardly on the list of senior candidates, much less at the top. He was able to become one of the top-two candidates by first energizing young voters and even some Republican voters who are unhappy with the party. Today, various people from different sectors have rallied behind Obama.
Another similarity exists between Taiwan and the US, and it is the economy. In newspapers and on TV in the US, there is much discussion about a possible recession and whether the state of the economy is good or not.
It is clear that some segments of the country are being hurt by the mortgage crisis and that the high price of oil is also hurting many people financially.
This has costs jobs and and lowered wages in some important sectors of the economy. US President George W. Bush is now seeking an "economic growth package" from Congress.
Taiwan's economy, for its part, continues to grow, but like the US, some important sectors of the economy -- mostly small and medium businesses -- have seen a drop in sales. The rise in oil prices has had a marked impact there, too.
The two presidential candidates have both been talking about what they would do to remedy the situation.
Still, Taiwan is Taiwan. It has its own history and the DPP has gone down a road that many people did not like, including people who had supported the party.
It now falls on Hsieh to bring back those voters who did not participate in the legislative elections and energize as many voters as possible.
Two months to achieve all this is not much time, but it sill may be possible.
Meanwhile, the KMT has the triple advantage of a two-thirds majority in the legislature, more money and a divided opponent.
Hsieh needs a unified party and must find a way to distance himself from the past.
He has wisely supported bipartisan efforts with the KMT, which can be seen by voters as a man who, as evidence of willingness to work with the legislature in developing relations with China and the international community.
Both candidates have said a lot about the economy and, increasingly, about people's concerns over its state. The important difference between the two candidates has been China, including the "opportunities" in China for Taiwan.
Hsieh has laid out down-to-earth economic projects that are welcome by many people, but there does not seem to be a plan within the rest of the DPP.
There has been one on the KMT side, but many changes have occurred in the speeches that have followed, especially on matters dealing with China.
One other problem has been in Hsieh's calls for a public debate with Ma.
There is nothing better for the people than to watch, listen and learn from the debates between candidates. Having one every week would ensure that Taiwanese understand the issues at hand and could also show them the differences in the candidates' leadership styles.
Sadly, with only eight weeks left, there is little indication that public debates will happen.
On the KMT side, Ma has made many speeches that, on the surface, would have us believe that his policies have changed, although his wording is not always clear.
On the DPP side, Hsieh is now saying he hopes for a coalition with the KMT, even to the point of asking Ma to become his premier. These are issues that could be clarified through public debates between the candidates.
Taiwanese will soon decide which party they want to lead them. One part of that equation -- the legislature -- has already been decided on. The other, the presidential election, is still up for grabs.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is now a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS