Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh's (
Taiwan is sometimes too easily influenced by other countries, and the CEO idea seems to have been inspired by the election of former CEO Lee Myung-bak as president of South Korea. Hsieh and KMT candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Hsieh's urgent selling of the idea is an attempt to show himself as a man of action who both talks the talk and walks the walk. It is also grounded in a wish to have a fresh face who could apply corporate experience to leading the Cabinet and kick-starting the economy and restoring morale after the DPP's demoralizing electoral showing on Jan. 12. If the appointment of a premier can also split KMT opinion, Hsieh would kill two birds with one stone.
But Hsieh's idea appears to have backfired. The right to appoint the premier belongs to the president, and Chen, who is wont to reject Chang's resignation, is probably not too happy with Hsieh's forceful push for the CEO idea only to be snubbed by the KMT after swallowing his pride and discussing the issue with Wu. Hsieh also upset Chang by pushing for the idea after pointedly saying that anyone wanting "a government position at this time is shameless." Hsieh has not only been unable to split KMT opinion, but may also have hurt DPP unity.
Regardless of who gets the premiership, there is less than four months until the next president is installed. A new premier will only have time to get a handle on his or her duties and the operations of the bureaucracy, prepare a policy report and engage the legislature for one month. Choosing a CEO who has little political experience raises the question of whether he or she would be able to control Cabinet members and deal with the opposition's massive legislative majority.
Add the fact that the KMT will do what it can to derail any possible achievements by the premier, and this would be a difficult situation for anyone, no matter how strong the premier might have been as a corporate CEO. The outcome of the presidential election is also uncertain, and not too many CEOs would be willing to serve as premier for mere months.
Given the proximity of the election, the DPP shouldn't waste too much time and effort on the issue. The current Cabinet is already a transition Cabinet that will only have time to prepare for the election, the two referendums and the transition to the next president.
Changing premiers now would have a negative impact on the DPP, so it is a good thing for the party that Hsieh has had to give up on the CEO idea earlier rather than later, thus avoiding further instability.
And if he still thinks it's such a good idea, he can appoint a CEO premier if he wins the election.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS