EUROPEANS ARE WRONG to be angry with China because its yuan peg to the US dollar has boosted the euro against most currencies on foreign exchange markets. On the contrary, they should view the peg as a valuable gift.
In New York and other US cities, European shoppers are on a spree. They're enjoying first-hand the euro's enhanced purchasing power abroad.
The currency peg has also helped turn the euro into an important reserve currency, rivaling the dollar. Investments from all over the world are flowing into Europe as a result.
It was predictable that China's currency peg would have this effect. It forced China to accumulate huge amounts of dollars to stabilize its currency and gave the euro an extra boost as the dollar depreciated.
To protect itself from the declining greenback, China and other countries are converting a portion of their accumulated dollar reserves into euros. The IMF estimates that the euro's share of foreign exchange reserves rose to 26.4 percent in the third quarter of last year from 25.5 percent in the second quarter and 24.4 percent in the third quarter of 2006.
The euro's becoming a major reserve currency bestows important economic advantages on the eurozone economy. Europeans should thank the Chinese currency peg for the part it is playing in this.
Of course, with an augmented supply of euros, China can be expected to make substantial investments in Europe, which is also a good thing, especially since, in the US at least, China has demonstrated a preference for investments in financial institutions rocked by the subprime crisis. Europe has plenty of those.
So far, China's biggest European investment has been in the Belgian financial company Fortis NV, where Ping An Insurance recently acquired a 4.2 percent stake, making it the largest shareholder in the company.
China Development Bank also made an investment in Barclays to bolster its bid for ABN Amro which, though it failed, helped the Dutch bank get full value for its assets.
This is only a start. Merrill Lynch predicts that as currency reserves climb in countries like China, state-run investment funds will grow to US$7.9 trillion from US$1.9 trillion now.
China's currency peg has also come in handy for Europe in its fight to keep inflation in check, while its monetary policy remains constrained by the subprime crisis.
Experts estimate that, in terms of guarding against inflation, the euro's appreciation has been equivalent to about a 35 basis point rise in the interest rate. The strong euro has helped insulate Europe from skyrocketing oil and commodity prices, which are priced in dollars on the world markets.
The big downside of the currency peg for Europe is supposed to be exports.
That's what sent French President Nicolas Sarkozy and other high-level European officials scurrying off to China in November -- and why many ordinary Europeans continue to think of the Chinese as not playing by the rules.
This is protectionist thinking par excellence. What makes exports so special? Why are they more important than cheap imports or the bargains that European shoppers get in New York? Should Europe give up all the advantages of the currency peg just because it makes European exports more expensive?
Of course not.
Note that it was Sarkozy who went to China to protest the peg, not German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
German exports are not being substantially damaged by the strong euro -- indeed, German costs are so competitive that exporters are confident they can cope with the euro at US$1.50 and even higher.
This is not true for France -- but the answer is obvious: reduce costs and France too will be able to cope with the strong euro.
In the final analysis, cutting costs is all the Europeans can do if they want to preserve the competitiveness of their exports. The Chinese are not going to change their exchange rate regime -- which has strategic as well as economic motivations -- just because the Europeans are unhappy with the currency peg.
China has given the Europeans a gift.
They should be grateful, rather than foolishly insist that China take it back.
Melvyn Krauss is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
An outrageous dismissal of the exemplary Taiwanese fight against COVID-19 has been perpetrated by the EU. There is no excuse. I presume that everyone who reads the Taipei Times knows that the EU has excluded Taiwan from its so-called “safe list,” which permits citizens unhindered travel to and from the countries of the EU. As the EU does not feel that it needs to explain the character of this exclusive list, perhaps we should examine it ourselves in some detail. There are 14 nations on the list that have been chosen as safe countries of origin and safe countries of destination for
Filmmakers in Taiwan used to struggle when it came to telling a story that could resonate internationally. Things started to change when the 2017 drama series The Teenage Psychic (通靈少女), a collaboration between HBO Asia and Taiwanese Public Television Service (PTS), became a huge hit not just locally, but also internationally. The coming-of-age story was adapted from the 2013 PTS-produced short film The Busy Young Psychic (神算). Entirely filmed in Taiwan, the Mandarin-language series even made it on HBO’s streaming platforms in the US. It is proof that a well-told Taiwanese story can absolutely win the hearts and minds of hard-to-please
Drugged with sedatives, handcuffed and wearing a bright orange prison tunic, British fraud investigator and former journalist Peter Humphrey was escorted by warders into an interrogation room filled with reporters, locked inside a steel cage and fastened to a metal “tiger chair.” Humphrey recalls: “I was completely surrounded by officers, dazed, manacled and with cameras pointing at me through the bars. I was fighting for my life like a caged animal. It was horrifying.” Footage from the interrogation was later artfully edited to give the appearance of a confession and broadcast on Chinese state media. While this might sound like an
The US House of Representatives on July 1 passed by unanimous consent a bipartisan bill that would penalize Chinese officials who implement Beijing’s new national security legislation in Hong Kong, as well as banks that do business with them. The following day, the US Senate unanimously passed the bill, which was later sent to the White House, where it awaits US President Donald Trump’s signature. The bill does not spell out what the sanctions would look like and Trump has yet to sign it into law, but Reuters on Thursday last week reported that five major Chinese state lenders are considering