TAIWAN'S DEMOCRACY HAS reached a watershed: Its future development depends upon the integrity of the parliamentary system, which in turn relies on the impartial help of each and every political party.
At the establishment of the Taiwan Vision Forum and Association (台灣前途展望協會), academics and other experts were invited to give their opinions of legislative operations. Among the myriad of perspectives there was a common desire to improve the situation of political opposition and hostility, inefficiency in the legislature and ineffective monitoring of Cabinet operations -- all of which could be corrected through changes in regulations governing the legislature and an overall elevation of the quality of legislators.
To address the behavior of individual legislators, the association has organized a campaign titled "I want a high-quality legislator." Legislative candidates from every party have responded in support. However, in terms of the overall operations of the legislative system, change depends on a consensus between political parties and a group effort in implementing new regulations.
After compiling recommendations regarding reforms in the legislative system and discussions with representatives from the Citizen Congress Watch (公民監督國會聯盟), the Peacetime Foundation of Taiwan (台灣促進和平文教基金會), the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum (台灣競爭力論壇) and other organizations all agreed that at the current stage, the legislature urgently needs transparency in its discussions between ruling and opposition parties, meetings of the Procedure Committee and voting.
Negotiations between ruling and opposition parties were originally intended to reconcile deadlocks, help reach a consensus and defuse emotive disputes. In the past, in order to maintain harmony and party prestige, politics were mostly discussed behind closed doors. Although the results of these meetings were eventually publicized, it was still satirized as "closed door politics" and it was suspected there were secret dealings between parties. Only with complete transparency in cross-party negotiations can the well-meaning efforts of political parties be understood by the public.
The Procedure Committee is responsible for determining the order in which proposals from various committees and the results of cross-party negotiations are considered on the legislative agenda. If you aren't a member of the committee, there is no access to this process. The smoothness of legislative sessions and the intensity of party conflicts are strongly influenced by the ordering of cases. If the process and results of Procedure Committee discussions were made public, it would allow better understanding of why highly contentious cases must take priority over those of a less controversial nature, and thus lead to better appreciation of the difficulties in party operations.
In democratic societies, voting is the last measure in determining controversial issues. The public has entrusted voting on bills to the legislators -- therefore all votes should be public. The Taiwan Vision Forum and Association hopes that open votes can become the norm. There is nothing that cannot be made public, especially when the issues are already public in nature.
The Taiwan Vision Forum and Association has organized a campaign advocating legislative transparency and invites all parties to lend their support. Hopefully, parties will be responsive to the public and allow the legislature to operate in the open.
Politics and the public can only remain in tune with transparency. Only then will parties accomplish the tasks they have been assigned by the public, rather than cheating them out of democracy.
Tang Fei is a former premier and current president of the Taiwan Vision Forum and Association.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT AND ANGELA HONG
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use