After six weeks of bitter wrangling over the voting format to be used in next week's legislative election and referendums, it seemed that a deal had been reached. But the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) suddenly announced on Monday that it would boycott both referendums, including its own. A boycott also looks likely for the two UN referendums to be held during the presidential election in March.
The decision came just a few weeks after KMT vice presidential candidate Vincent Siew (
It would be interesting to know if Burghardt's conversations with any of the KMT officials he met during his visit touched on the subject of a boycott, as any decision to shun the UN plebiscite in March would certainly fall in line with Washington's very public opposition to the process.
Despite repeated assurances from Washington that it is not interfering in Taiwan's democracy, the notion that multiple warnings from the world's most powerful nation and Taiwan's sole security guarantor will have no effect on public sentiment ahead of the poll is disingenuous, to say the least.
The message emanating from Washington is that the referendum will alter the cross-strait "status quo," but the question must be asked again: Why is it that only Taiwan is capable of disturbing this fictional balancing act? Beijing's mounting aggression has never earned it public rebukes of this order.
In a September speech to the US-Taiwan Business Council, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Thomas Christensen accused President Chen Shui-bian (
Perhaps Christensen could have been asked to suggest which political party in the democratic world does not attempt to influence public opinion to further its ambitions. The Republicans certainly did so when it made the case for the invasion of Iraq.
What the US is afraid of is the Taiwanese electorate making a statement that Beijing -- and KMT hardliners for that matter -- doesn't want to hear.
It is hard to know what Washington expects from a country that has been unshackled from five decades of authoritarian rule. Surely this would not include a free and democratic people staying silent indefinitely and thus inviting a repressive state to interfere with and ultimately dominate them?
Even now it is not clear if US strategists are banking on economic reform leading to democratic reform in China and a peaceful settlement in the Taiwan Strait. But even if this is the case, it is not going to happen anytime soon. Hard-headed officials must therefore understand that Taiwan's status cannot remain in limbo indefinitely if China issues threats every few months and continues to pack its coastline with ordnance.
Taiwanese are not stupid; indeed, they are reliably pragmatic. Poll after poll has shown that the overwhelming majority are not interested in making dramatic ideological gambits in the cause of independence or unification.
So, if Washington believes that this thing called "democracy" has value outside the US, then it should show respect to Taiwanese by desisting with patronizing language and partisan doomsaying. Voters of goodwill are putting up with enough cynical, anti-democratic behavior from the KMT without having to factor in muddle-headed warnings from Washington.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.