Democracy does not fall from the sky, nor does it mature overnight. In the last seven years, Taiwan's road to democracy has been filled with chaos stemming from a lack of values and reckless political opposition. "Democratic civil war" aptly describes the process.
Our democracy is in a state of conflict that highlights the immaturity of our system. This is inevitable during the transition from an authoritarian to a democratic system.
But Taiwan's situation is unique: Other than the reactionary forces of the deposed Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), there is also political intervention by the media -- themselves a relic of the party-state system -- that further intensifies the infighting.
Two major causes of this democratic civil war are the pro-unification media and the KMT's attempts to regain power. In a mature democracy, the media is a political watchdog that prevents corruption and asserts social justice. But Taiwan's fourth estate has no public credibility. Just as it was once the mouthpiece of the party-state, it now makes up the front-line troops in the attempt to restore the party-state.
The bloody deeds of the KMT during its 40 years of rule include the 228 Incident, the White Terror era, the overseas blacklist, the Kaohsiung Incident, the death of Chen Wen-chen (陳文成) and the murder of Lin I-hsiung's (林義雄) family members.
These atrocities have not been fully addressed legally or historically and the KMT still does not dare confront them. The media are also afraid to confront the past.
The pro-unification media outlets escape responsibility with specious arguments, brainwashing the younger generation so that the KMT can wash it hands of its past as though nothing happened.
The pro-unification media conceals the KMT's historical responsibility while highlighting clashes between parties over minor issues and misleading the public.
But their political intervention is unsurprising given the background of high-level media executives.
The majority of executives in the electronic media and the United Daily News as well as the China Times were "media elite youths" specially fostered by the KMT. Many of them, especially those at TTV, CTS and CTV, as well as the two papers, received KMT scholarships while studying abroad. Upon their return, these individuals repaid the party-state through their work. Most of them are high-level executives or famed commentators on television and in the two papers. How can these individuals be expected to show any goodwill to the Democratic Progressive Party?
Then there are the KMT's party assets. No other country in the world would allow a political party to keep such a large amount of wealth and use it to compete unfairly against its rivals. If it were not for the fact that the media help to obstruct any disadvantageous legislation, the reclaiming of the KMT's ill-gotten assets would not be so difficult. The media cannot be overlooked in the party's ability to retain and utilize its wealth -- their "cooperation" is the greatest obstacle to the deepening of Taiwanese democracy.
If the KMT is not thoroughly dismantled, it will be near impossible for Taiwan and Taiwanese media to normalize.
Taiwan is in the midst of a painful democratic civil war. Next year's elections hold the key to whether Taiwan can divest itself of the KMT and continue to promote democracy. Without the advantage of strong media backing or wealth from ill-gotten assets, those of us with firm democratic ideals must have the courage to fight to the finish.
Michelle Wang is the deputy secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Angela Hong
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS