I read with interest a letter by Ben Goren (Letters, Dec. 17, page 8) in which he argued passionately for redefining the term `Taiwanese' to be more inclusive.
Goren's analysis was articulate, but at the same time heavily partisan -- betraying an agenda of supporting the DPP in the upcoming elections.
Like many letters from foreigners in Taiwan, in his letter, Goren has allowed himself to be influenced by the propaganda spread by President Chen Shui-bian (
Goren's letter tying identity to Taiwan's environment is a fantasy that ignores and refuses to accept the long standing historical, cultural and ethnic ties between Taiwan and China.
His analysis encourages readers to sympathize with a groundless "Taiwanese" nationalism that not only lacks support but is also driven by political interests and is not welcomed by the international community.
Pie-in-the-sky postulations like his fail owing to their core misunderstanding of Chinese culture and identity.
Goren's Utopian platform does not go even so far as to recognize the importance of the Republic of China to the economic welfare of residents in Taiwan. His prioritization of environment over the economy is amusing, revealing his isolation from the day-to-day hardships faced by ordinary people under a government that cares more about symbolic victories than sound governance and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
Over the past seven years -- Chen's administration -- ?Mainlanders have suffered ethnic discrimination and have been ostracized by society simply because they happened to have been born -- or have parents who were born -- across the Strait.
They are increasingly bewildered that the Chen administration and cheerleaders like Goren direct an invective towards them when a majority of the country clearly identifies with a culture and heritage shared across the Strait.
Rather than glossing over this cultural connection, Goren should see that, apart from Taiwan's Aborigines, nearly everyone in Taiwan shares a similar history and point of origin in China. This shared history will prove to be stronger than imagined nationalities cooked up for local power concerns.
Milton Liao
Chicago, Illinois
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS