The Taj Mahal, one of the world's architectural masterpieces, welcomes about 2.5 million visitors each year -- provided they don't try to buy tickets with US dollars. India's most popular shrine announced last month that it would stop accepting the US currency and take only rupees, hurling yet another insult at the once mighty greenback.
The dollar, which has been snubbed by everybody from government officials in Kuwait and South Korea to top-earning Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bundchen, may not recover its luster. Economists say the currency, which has declined in five of the past six years against the euro, is caught in a downdraft as investors pour into Asia, prompting a tectonic shift in economic power from the US.
"Can it be turned around? Probably not totally," says Riordan Roett, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. "The century of Asia has arrived, and the US and its European allies will need to adjust to that."
In Asia, an investment boom has boosted local currencies. China's roaring economy has grown an average of 10.4 percent in the past four years, fueled by record exports and a flood of foreign funds. That's pushed up the yuan since the government ended the currency's peg to the dollar in July 2005. As of Wednesday, the yuan -- managed against a basket of currencies -- climbed 12 percent against the dollar.
The Indian economy has grown at its fastest pace in the past four years since independence in 1947. That's helped to lift the rupee 12 percent against the US currency this year through Wednesday.
Dollar bulls say the currency, which rose to its highest in seven weeks against the euro on Wednesday, could rally further next year. They cite this year's fiscal US budget deficit, which fell to US$162.8 billion compared with US$412.8 billion three years earlier. And the current account deficit narrowed to US$178.5 billion in the third quarter after reaching a record US$217.3 billion in the period last year.
Deutsche Bank AG, the world's largest currency trader, predicts the dollar next year will rise about 2 percent more versus the euro, a currency shared by 15 nations as of next month.
Longer-term, the slowing US economy -- hurt by a banking and consumer credit meltdown that's only getting worse -- will weigh heavily on the dollar. Since August, the Federal Reserve has cut interest rates three times to 4.25 percent this month and traders in federal funds futures see about an even chance the rate will be 3.75 percent by May.
The Fed's moves, coupled with the European Central Bank's threat this month to raise rates, have tilted the odds against the US currency. This year, it fell 8 percent against the euro and 2 percent versus the British pound through Wednesday.
Asian and Persian Gulf nations are concerned that the flight from the dollar is feeding on itself and may spur a crisis of confidence.
Kuwait abandoned a dollar peg in May due to its weak buying power. South Korea's central bank last month urged shipbuilders to issue invoices in won, the country's currency, and take out more hedging policies to guard against the weakened dollar.
Peter Kenen, a professor of international finance at Princeton University, raises the possibility that the dollar's role as the world's dominant reserve currency may be coming to an end. The dollar's share of central banks' currency portfolios slid to 64.8 percent in this year's second quarter from 71 percent in 1999, the year the euro debuted, the IMF says.
Cash-rich governments, mostly in Asia and the Middle East, may shift as much as US$1.2 trillion in dollar holdings to other currencies in the next five years, Merrill Lynch & Co economists say.
"The dollar will not recover completely its dominant role in the system, although it may well share that role with the euro and even the pound," says Kenen, a former Treasury adviser. "What some of us thought could happen in the distant future may be upon us now."
Lester Thurow, a professor of economics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, disputes the assertion that the dollar has lost its clout. Historical trends of developing nations suggest China's economic output and per-capita income may not catch up to the US's for about a century.
"A reserve currency needs to be the currency of a world power," Thurow says. "China may pass the US, but not until 2100."
China, with US$1.46 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, is a wild card. Its financial leaders are combing the world's markets for investments that pay more than the return of about 4 percent on 10-year US Treasury bonds.
Chinese investors reduced their holdings of U.S. Treasuries by 8 percent to US$388.1 billion in October from a peak in March. Then, early this month, China's Ministry of Commerce gave a boost to the dollar, saying it would encourage more businesses to buy US assets.
Morgan Stanley, the second-largest US securities firm, on Wednesday said it received a US$5 billion infusion from the state-controlled China Investment Corp. The firm lost US$3.56 billion in the fourth quarter amid the subprime mortgage market collapse.
Economists debate whether the administration of US President George W. Bush wants the dollar to appreciate. After US trading partners in Europe and Japan criticized the currency's decline, US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson last month stepped up his rhetoric about the economy's long-term growth prospects to instill confidence in the dollar, says Jens Nordvig, an economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc in New York.
With the weak dollar spurring US exports -- one of the few bright spots in the economy -- some economists don't take Paulson at his word.
"The Bush administration is not sincere in saying it wants a strong dollar," says Nobel laureate Paul Samuelson, a professor emeritus at MIT. "The long-run trend for the dollar is very likely to be downward."
The currency will be barred from more places than the Taj Mahal in the event Samuelson is right.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed