The European Central Bank (ECB) remains seriously out of step with other key central banks in the industrial world despite recently announced coordinated efforts to increase short-term liquidity in the banking system.
The US, Canada and the UK all have cut interest rates recently. But the ECB holds firm against cutting; indeed, after the Governing Council's December meeting, ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said that some members were in favor of raising rates.
Who are they kidding? Everyone knows that the ECB cannot raise interest rates now and for some time to come. In the midst of the most serious financial crisis in recent memory, the ECB has resorted to an unconvincing bluff, because it has an inflationary expectations problem.
Past policy missteps are responsible for the ECB's present predicament.
The first misstep was the ECB's delay in tightening monetary policy, long after it had become obvious that interest rates had been held too low (at 2 percent) for too long (from June 2003 to December 2005). The ECB's hawks, understanding the dangers of abnormally low interest rates for a central bank whose primary objective is price stability, had been eager to start raising rates earlier. But the leadership was too timid.
A faster pace for rates hikes could have offset the slow start, but the ECB again erred on the side of caution. For reasons that are unclear, Trichet, in contrast to the ECB's first president, Wim Duisenberg, has wanted to raise rates by only 25 basis points at a time. Many in the Governing Council wanted to go faster, because they knew they had a long journey in front of them, but Trichet refused.
The hawks were right to be in a hurry. Because of the late start and slow pace, the Governing Council had reached only the 4 percent mark when the current financial crisis effectively put a lid on further rate hikes. Trichet even had to rescind the rate hike he had signaled for September, though he still claims the increase has been merely postponed, not abandoned.
Not a chance. The truth is that ECB would not be in this predicament if the central bank had reached the 4.75 percent or even 5 percent level by now. Higher rates would have meant lower inflation, so that inflationary expectations would not be the issue they have become. Moreover, from a higher rate level, the ECB would be in a better position to cut rates now that the economy is slowing.
Several frustrated hawks on the Governing Council are dead set against cutting interest rates precisely because they believe that, at 4 percent, rates already have been "cut" from the 5 percent or so levels they had expected to achieve. They don't want to go further, and one can understand their chagrin, if not agree with their policy stance.
The ECB will have to cut interest rates next year if it wants to avoid a hard landing for the euro-zone economy.
Being out of step has consequences. The euro has sharply appreciated, for example, causing Trichet to condemn "brutal" currency moves. When the Canadian dollar sharply appreciated, the Bank of Canada did more than talk -- it cut interest rates.
The ECB has the same option, but refuses to use it. Along with its empty threats of interest rate hikes, there is a real danger the ECB will be labeled the central bank that barks but doesn't bite (animal behaviorists know that barking and biting are substitutes, not complements).
The ECB's credibility is on the line. How seriously, one wonders, did the Chinese take Trichet when he came to China to protest the euro's "brutal" appreciation against the renminbi? Cut your own interest rates, they must have thought to themselves, and you will have less to complain about.
Being out of step also focuses attention on the fact that the ECB is in danger of losing control over inflationary expectations. The US Federal Reserve can cut 100 basis points from the federal funds rate and not lose control over US inflationary expectations. Yet, the ECB cannot cut interest rates 1 basis point because it fears euro-zone inflationary expectations are becoming unglued.
This is clear and convincing evidence of the ECB's previous policy missteps in the normalization of interest rate process. If Europe's central bank had not been too late and too slow in the past, it would have been truer to its own price stability mandate, and not now out of step with central banks in other industrial countries.
Melvyn Krauss is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations