I read in abject disbelief in this morning's paper that Ma Ying-jeou (
This is the same man who, at a speech given to members of Taiwan's foreign business community at the Howard Plaza Hotel on Nov. 29, was not able to understand an important question on the subject of greenhouse gases from an English-speaker in the very front row.
Some stark facts from an letter by Stephen Krashen (Letters, Nov. 22, page 8) bear immediate repetition.
A proposed "English village" would be a "one-week English immersion experience for students between the ages of 13 and 14 years" that "can accommodate 200 students at a time," he said.
Krashen pointed out that if "three villages are set up, they can accommodate about 600 students a week. That amounts to about 25,000 a year." Doing the math, Krashen concluded that "fewer than 1 percent of the children in school in Taiwan will experience the English village, and the experience only lasts one week."
This leaves me wondering where Ma is getting his advice with respect to the future of English in Taiwan.
It seems likely he is drawing from the exaggerated -- although popular -- claims in support of the efficacy of language-learning by speaking and listening in a target-language community.
But research clearly shows that this approach is egregiously inferior to those that emphasize more focused, comprehensible, examined input.
Leaving aside the issue of how much money would be squandered for such an initiative, one should hope for Ma's sake that any proposals he might have to combat greenhouse gases are not nearly so specious.
Martin de Jonge
Fulong, Taipei County
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,