THE DAY BEFORE the inscription dazhong zhizheng (大中至正) was taken down from the main gate at the National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall, an ETTV cameraman was run over by a truck. The whole country could see on the news how the cameraman was dragged in under the truck, while his colleagues cried as they filmed and photographed the incident. This shows the danger that journalists face, and how they are often torn between humanitarian and professional ethics. It's very distressing. But off-screen lurks a tragic reality.
Reading each of the four major national newspapers on Dec. 8, three of them had a picture of the terrible scene and the badly injured cameraman on the front page. Such stark news images being violently pushed by the media is precisely what the French post-modernist Jean Baudrillard mentioned in his writings: It was a sensational pleasure derived from images, just like the case of the dead in the mass grave in Timisoara in Romania.
The brave and professional actions of a cameraman on the front lines was treated in the same fashion as the bloody, sensational images produced when crocodile bit off the arm of a veterinarian at a zoo in Kaohsiung. Tragedies and serious accidents like this are hard to bear for a responsible news industry.
Upon opening newspapers, we were stunned to see that they published strong denouncements of this violent incident inside. Seeing this misplaced hypocrisy, we can't help asking whether the media outlets that use media violence and write up the misfortunes of a fellow journalist are really qualified to denounce the troublemakers who instigated this accident.
If they really want to denounce someone, why don't they look into the background of the troublemakers, or thoroughly investigate the motives behind the accident? Isn't faithfully reporting the actual state of affairs the most important work that people in the news industry do?
Going back to the TV news of the cameraman's accident, even though some channels pixilated the footage of the injured man, the public had to witness yet again how some channels sensationalized this tragic incident to obscure the core facts.
First, they intentionally misled viewers by proclaiming on their news scrollers that the truck driver had a pan-green background -- without checking to see if this was true.
Second, when it became clear that the driver was assisting the campaign of a pro-unification politician, some channels tried to obscure the facts by saying on their scrollers that the driver had a record of attacking Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) -- omitting the fact that the reasons for those attacks was that the driver believed Ma was not pro-unification enough.
This coverage was a textbook case of using selective exposure to hide the facts. Does this do justice to the professionalism of a cameraman who took serious risks to film a news event?
The top managers who ordered that news should be reported in this manner should be ashamed of themselves considering the risks their frontline workers face.
Lillian Wang is an associate professor of journalism at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS