Growing concerns about inflationary pressure have recently raised questions of the central bank's monetary policy: Should the central bank continue raising interest rates rather than allow the NT dollar to grow stronger to stem inflation?
The central bank has hiked its benchmark interest rates for 13 consecutive quarters since October 2004 and is expected to increase them once again at its board meeting later this month.
But inflation remained elevated last month and the effect of continued interest rate hikes seemed to be limited.
The latest government statistics released last week showed the consumer price index (CPI) rose 4.8 percent year-on-year last month, following a 5.33 percent increase in October -- the highest single-month increase in nearly 13 years.
While the recent surge in CPI readings mainly reflects the short-term effect of higher food prices and energy costs, a rising trend in core CPI (an inflation indicator that excludes fresh fruit, vegetables, fish and energy) presents evidence of broader upward pressure on prices.
During his appearance before the legislature's Finance Committee on Thursday, central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (
Trying to avoid the media misinterpreting his remarks on interest rates and the NT dollar, Perng decided to give a lecture on the basic monetary economics of supply and demand to reporters on Friday in the bank's press room.
He again stressed that the bank's main priority was to maintain price stability and that it would take whatever measures it deemed appropriate to achieve that goal. He said the central bank had never intended to maintain a low NT dollar in favor of exporters by buying bulks of US dollars.
The problem is that no matter what Perng says, no one believes the bank has not intervened in the foreign exchange market to manipulate the value of the NT dollar. No one.
It's understandable that Perng's remarks were aimed at assuring people that the central bank would not let inflation get out of control. It is also reasonable that Perng, like his counterparts elsewhere in the world, will never make remarks that are totally clear and transparent to the public. He would prefer people to see what the central bank has done rather than predict what it will do.
The question is whether the central bank's tightening policy has reached its optimal effect of absorbing excess liquidity in the banking system without making the price situation worse?
The growing calls on the central bank to allow the NT dollar to appreciate are theoretically appealing because doing so will help lower the price of imports.
But another challenge facing the central bank and the government is whether they are willing to see exporters hurt and to have the nation's economic growth prospects clouded ahead of the legislative and presidential elections.
It could be a wild, unwarranted guess that this potential risk to the political scenario has placed the central bank in an awkward position today.
But it is obvious that the central bank is faced with a dilemma of how to effectively exercise its monetary policy in order to boost the economy while controlling inflation.
However, this is not a problem facing Perng and his bank alone. Central banks throughout Asia are grappling with the same challenge.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,