I am writing in response to the letter from Craig Dodge (Letters, Nov. 6, page 8).
Dodge proposes deploying more motorcycles as a solution to Taipei's traffic and pollution problems. That's just what we need in this woefully congested, polluted city, where wholly irresponsible scooter drivers run riot.
"Drivers seem to have this feeling of entitlement," Dodge wrote, and they misguidedly "view motorcycles as a nuisance." I'll keep "entitlement" and "nuisance" in mind the next time I dodge a scooter cruising at medium speed through a crowd of pedestrians in a crosswalk in Taipei, roaring through a red light at top speed, or forcing me to leap to the side of a bike and walking path along a river in Taipei (where scooters are, ostensibly, forbidden).
We can also wax enthusiastic about scooters and their drivers as we pick our way through a multitude of scooters clogging Taipei sidewalks, making our way through some of the most uncomfortable, dirty, chaotic conditions we have to live with in this city.
Dodge does some math and figures that things would be a whole lot better in Taiwan if every car driver would just get a scooter -- as if adding tens of thousands more of those obnoxious machines on the roads would transform Taiwanese cities into Shangri-Las.
Dodge asks if scooters are as noisy as diesel trucks and buses. I don't have the numbers to back up my claim, but I have noted that three or four of those howler-monkey, shrieking scooter engines can easily be as noisy as a city bus. And multiply that by tens of thousands.
This city's noise pollution -- a greatly overlooked problem in Taipei -- is created first and foremost by scooters. And let's not even talk about how much air pollution the millions of scooters create.
Don't get me wrong. I am not advocating a few million more automobiles in Taiwan. The vehicle culture here is an absolute tragedy -- and one of the reasons that so many people are left shaking their heads at what they witness.
The best thing that could ever happen to Taiwan is if there were virtually no scooters at all and if we work to reduce the number of automobiles. Then maybe we can use other responsible transportation solutions to try to create a safer, more comfortable, cleaner and certainly much greener and sustainable society.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS