The tempests in a teacup we are seeing these days make me nostalgic for 1997. That was the year that Diana, Princess of Wales, died in a car accident and Mother Teresa died, but also, of the past 14 years, this was the year that relations between ethnic groups in Taiwanese society were at their most stable.
If we take the number of times the media mentioned "ethnic conflict" as an index for measuring changes in the relations between ethnic groups, we find that in two of Taiwan's most important print media, the China Times and the United Daily News, the term "ethnic conflict" was mentioned in their articles only eight and six times respectively in 1997.
In the 13 years between 1994 and last year, the average number of times each paper used the term was more than 50. The most it was used was in 2004. Articles in these two papers mentioned it as many as 145 and 109 times respectively.
The year 1994 was an important watershed in the development of democratic politics in Taiwan. In that year, elections were held for the provincial governor of Taiwan and for the mayors of Taipei and Kaohsiung. It was at that point that ethnic politics were brought onto the central political stage.
In the 13 years since 1994, Taiwan has held three presidential elections, four legislative elections, three elections for mayors and city counselors, four elections for mayors and city counselors of Taipei and Kaohsiung, and one for provincial governor.
In each of those elections, "ethnic conflict" has been the focus of attention of opinion, and it was also one of the most important bases that politicians built on to generate support.
From 1994 to last year, the number of times the media used the term "ethnic conflict" peaked five times, namely in 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004 and last year. In the first four of these years, there were legislative elections. That usage of the term also peaked last year in relation to the "anti-corruption" movement against President Chen Shui-bian (
We can look further into how different kinds of elections influenced media reports. In years where there were no legislative elections, the China Times and the United Daily News mentioned "ethnic conflict" 36 and 40 times respectively.
In years with legislative elections this jumped to 90 and 74 times. Looking at the average per month for each paper, the number was higher for years with legislative elections than for years without, especially in November. In years with legislative elections the number of times the term "ethnic conflict" was mentioned was three times as high as in years without such elections.
The number of times the term was mentioned in years with no presidential election was 47 and 48 times respectively, while for years with a presidential election this was 71 and 58 times. Each time there was a presidential election, the number of times these two papers mentioned "ethnic conflict" in their articles started increasing from January onward, and peaked in March.
In comparison, legislative and presidential elections have the most influence on the use of the word "ethnic conflict" in the media, while the influence of elections of mayors and county commissioners is the smallest. This difference can help us understand the phenomenon of ethnic conflict in Taiwan.
First, the meaning and importance of the subject of ethnicity is different in different kinds of elections. In elections for mayors and county commissioners, taking a position on ethnicity is not a very effective way of attracting candidates or voters, so there were less articles about "ethnic conflict" around such elections.
In presidential elections, apart from ability and principles, the background and identity of a presidential candidate often has symbolic meaning for the entire country.
Important issues include candidates' family background, which languages they speak, their opinion on history, their attitude about culture and their position on unification or independence. This way, "ethnic conflict" easily becomes a focus of the media.
Reports in the media on the seriousness of the "ethnic conflict" are also related to the election system.
Take legislative elections as an example. In the elections for the third through the sixth legislature, a system of multi-member districts was used, with the result that all candidates were elected, no matter if they got 100,000 votes or 30,000 votes. In such a system, some candidates used more extreme methods in their election campaign in order to reach the lowest threshold necessary to be elected. One tactic included was the use of ethnic language.
Simply said, when media use the term "ethnic conflict," they don't do so continuously or for years on an end. Usage of the term is rather something that waxed and waned over time, and it is strongly tied to influence by political movements and by the election system.
Of course one might ask why the number of times the media used "ethnic conflict" was so low in 1997.
Behind the peace of ethnic relations in that year was in fact a hard-learned lesson, that people may not want to think about -- the kidnapping and murder of 17-year-old Pai Hsiao-yen (白曉燕), daughter of entertainer Pai Ping-ping (白冰冰). Perhaps it was because of the criminal behavior of people like Chen Chin-hsing (陳進興), one of Pai's killers, that the Taiwanese realized the corruption of public security and the powerlessness of the government had reached an unacceptable level.
Or maybe it was seeing the helpless body of Pai Hsiao-yen, or her mother Pai Ping-ping's deep sorrow, that reminded the Taiwanese of the fact that there are more important things than "ethnicity" to cherish and fight for.
Li Kuang-jun is an associate professor at the Center for General Education at National Central University.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
US President Donald Trump on Monday gave his inauguration speech. Although mainly directed at US citizens, his words were subject to global scrutiny by leaders and others wanting to understand more about his intentions for his second term. The US has been Taiwan’s strongest ally since the end of World War II and Trump’s first term brought many welcome advances in Taiwan-US ties. Still, many Taiwanese are concerned about what Trump’s second term will mean for the nation, especially after comments he made concerning Taiwan’s national defense and semiconductor industry. During Monday’s address, Trump said that the US “will once again consider
RSS