THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Administration's environmental evaluation committee convened its taskforce on the construction of the Suhua Freeway on Thursday to review an analysis of pre- and post-development environmental conditions resubmitted by the Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau.
The report only occasionally refers to the project's possible impact on the local economy and environment, which concerns both non-governmental participants and members of the environmental evaluation committee, who requested the bureau submit documentation to support their findings.
This time around, environmental evaluatizon committee members finally took note of suggestions made by long-ignored Aboriginal groups in Hualien and requested that the bureau follow the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act (原住民族基本法) by establishing how traditional Aboriginal areas along the freeway might be affected.
The bureau report said the freeway will pass through traditional Truku areas in Hoping (和平), Chungte (崇德) and Hsiulin (秀林) villages as well as land reserved for Aborigines. Article 21 of the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act, passed in 2005, stipulates that the government or private individuals engaging in land development, resource usage, ecological preservation or academic research on Aboriginal land should consult with and obtain the approval or participation of Aborigines, who should also share in any profits.
Regrettably, government agencies have again ignored the Truku tribe. Whether or not the Truku tribe approves of the freeway, throughout the whole process the government has ignored their suggestions and has not taken the initiative to establish a platform for discussing the matter.
The government has ignored suggestions and dissenting opinions from Aborigines and given ample proof that when Aboriginal rights collide with national policy, the government acts to gain control over Aboriginal living space. Many basic Aboriginal rights have not been enforced.
The freeway will indeed run through traditional Truku land and thus affect our living environment. The government should follow the Environmental Impact Assessment Act and make a proper evaluation of the impact on local Aboriginal tribes and set up a dialogue with them.
Despite the potential effects of this massive project on Hualien, national and local government officials have failed to organize local public hearings or explanatory meetings.
This reluctance to release project information means that local residents only have a limited understanding of the possible benefits and liabilities for Hualien.
With the government's strong push for the project, dissenting opinions among local residents have been ignored by elected officials and the media.
Many Hualien residents don't oppose a freeway per se, but they do not agree that accept that the freeway under development is the only viable option for developing Hualien without making a careful assessment of the region's actual needs.
The planned project could destroy the Hualien landscape and the government's attitude shows a total lack of respect for the opinions and needs of local residents.
The government must reassess this highly disputed project and listen to the needs of local residents.
The bizarre situation, with national government and local officials doing all they can to persuade the public to blindly accept the project as it is, must not be allowed to continue.
Ciwang Teyra is director of the Information and Publication Division at the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and a member of the Truku tribe.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS