I am shocked that Yang Yung-nane (
Let us hope that Yang's assertion that "the security of the president equals the security of the nation" was a mistranslation because it is patently absurd.
No head of state of any country anywhere is equivalent to the country he/she serves. Individuals occupying such offices come and go -- at least in democracies -- but their nations and the offices they occupy during their terms endure.
Thus, while the security of the nation is clearly related to the security of the institution of head of state, the security of individuals serving in that capacity is of vastly lesser importance.
Evidence of this difference is not difficult to find. At no time, for example, was the security of the US ever at risk as a result of the assassination of president John F. Kennedy in 1963.
Similar examples from other countries can also be found.
The second misinterpretation Yang makes is his failure to note that the proximate cause of the guard's suicide was instability so great as to render him incapable of dealing with a personal crisis in a more restrained and less violent manner.
Instability of such magnitude is not created by a single shattered romance. Rather, it develops over time and can have physical as well as mental or emotional bases. In other words, the man was a bomb lacking only a trigger and likely had been for some time.
Why did no one notice this? How many others in the national security forces are on or near the ragged edge of violence? These questions, and others, must be answered in the coming days or weeks and appropriate measures taken with similar dispatch. They cannot wait for the "government ... [to] ... spend some time examining the presidential security system and reviewing problems in organizational management" as Yang advocates.
Yang is also miles off-base in asserting that "focusing on the guards would only make them feel like there's something wrong with them and would further undermine their morale or dignity." Surely he knows that responsible officials can present an exhaustive screening program aimed at rooting out unstable security force members in many ways.
One such program might be to allude to the possibility that the public now questions the ability of the force to protect government officials and that the proposed screening is intended to demonstrate the stability and professionalism of force members.
Concern for the "morale or dignity" of force personnel should be, at best, a minor priority. These officers are either members of the military or its equivalent.
As such, they should be disciplined enough to accept testing of their mental and emotional fitness to serve, just as they accept testing of their physical fitness and weapons-handling ability.
If any are not so well disciplined, they probably should not be serving in such a sensitive capacity in the first place.
The method of dealing with marginal members of the security forces (those "with issues or who have been employed through connections or to fill a vacancy") that Yang favors is also flawed. He says they should be "retrained." But retrained as what? Truck drivers? Nannies?
If he means that guards who obtained their jobs as a result of any motivation other than sincere interest in security work, or who are dangerously unstable, should be indoctrinated by forced attendance to lectures on the Three Principles of the People or "the Tao of Security," he needs to reevaluate his position -- or perhaps even get out of academia for a while and take long walks in the real world.
Security is a profession -- a vital one -- and those involved in it must be treated accordingly. That means holding aspirants and incumbents to the highest mental, moral, physical and emotional standards. Nothing less will do.
Yang is correct in asserting that the deficiencies exposed by the guard's suicide must be addressed. I differ with him only in the manner in which they should be addressed and the urgency of the need for such attention.
Kung Teh-wen
Chingshui,
Taichung County
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS