Last week a military police captain serving as a security guard in the presidential residence killed himself while on duty. The cause of the suicide is still being investigated. Since President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his family members were all in the building when the incident occurred, it sent shockwaves through the Presidential Office and the National Security Bureau (NSB).
After the incident, many people focused on the reason for the suicide. Since the case involved a death and occurred in the presidential residence, a comprehensive and thorough investigation needs to be conducted.
At age 27, the military officer was still young, and working at the presidential residence, he supposedly should have had a promising career ahead of him. Moreover, the fact that the officer chose to kill himself while on duty hints of a connection to the national security establishment and how it is managed -- the national security mechanism.
The investigation into the case therefore must not overlook the security gaps exposed by the incident. Since the security of the president equals the security of the nation, any mistake could lead to national unrest. Thus, no gaps in security can be tolerated. Whatever the cause of the suicide, we cannot disregard the existing problems in the national security system.
After thorough analysis of the related information, it would seem that this case exposes at least three serious gaps in the national security mechanism.
First are the gaps in the sentry duty system.
The president and his family were in the residence when the suicide occurred which immediately creating a gap in the system and a problem for the safety of the president and his family members.
Although we do not know whether the security system instantly filled the hole or whether the security organization instantly adjusted the security management to ensure safety, it can be easily seen from the following that a security problem continues to exist.
There were gaps in risk management after the incident. In theory, there should be a quick response after an incident occurs. Yet media reports said the officer wasn't immediately sent to the hospital, and that the president, the command center and the internal organizations had inconsistent interpretations of the incident, especially regarding the reasons for the suicide.
This gap and inconsistency could lead not only to low morale among security guards but could also have an impact on security. The main point is that this incident exposes organizational disorder and gaps in the crisis management mechanism.
Having looked at the gaps in the national security mechanism, how should the situation be improved? Some legislators have suggested that the NSB should immediately evaluate the mental health of all security guards serving in key postings such as at the presidential and vice presidential residences and workplaces, especially for those armed bodyguards and security guards working close to the president and vice president. Any guards with issues or who have been employed through connections or just to fill a vacancy should all be retrained.
However, the government should spend some time examining the presidential security system and reviewing problems in organizational management rather than focusing on individuals and trying to root out guards who may have mental problems.
Focusing on the guards would only make them feel like there's something wrong with them and would further undermine their morale or dignity.
The proper way of dealing with this is to establish strict mechanisms for the selection, supervision, management, consulting, guidance, assistance and training for the security guards. We must address these gaps in the national security mechanism.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor at the Department of Political Science and vice dean of the College of Social Sciences at Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Ted Yang
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,