Being lectured by a two-time presidential election loser is hardly an intimidating prospect, unless that person holds an honorary title in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and his audience is the KMT faithful.
Former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
He should know.
Lien made the remarks after learning that the party's highest decision-making body, the Central Standing Committee, on Wednesday agreed to delete the Guidelines for National Unification and the fictional "1992 consensus" from the party's mission statement for next year.
It would have been most creditable if the KMT had let go of its fantasy of unification and followed mainstream opinion backing Taiwan as a sovereign entity.
However, just as it seemed the party was really doing this -- in the hours after the United Daily News story hit the stands -- the KMT flatly denied that it had changed its cross-strait policy.
Instead, KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma said that the KMT's annual mission statement was less important than the party charter and guidelines, both of which enshrine the goal of unification with China.
KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (
As Ma pointed out, this fuss is over an annual mission statement.
Just because the terms were taken out of the statement does not mean that they cannot be reinstated, nor does it mean that they do not inform KMT policy and strategy.
Wu then made some intriguing remarks to a group of veterans on Wednesday as he called on deep-blue supporters to show understanding for Ma: "Some things that [Ma] said may not be in sync with our highest standards ... but so long as he is elected, all the things that worry you will disappear."
If all this is indeed an election ploy aimed at pan-green votes, then the KMT might do well to heed Lien's words.
On Thursday Lien went on to say that the KMT would be wrong to think that scrapping these elements from its mission statement would allow it to claw more votes away from the pan-green camp.
Lien may have lost two presidential campaigns, but he might have finally come to know a thing or two about voters.
Besides, if Taiwanese are so easily fooled, Lien would have sealed a 2004 election victory after prostrating himself and kissing the ground to demonstrate his love for the nation in front of the Presidential Office.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in