The fundamental tone of Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
The joint press communique issued by the CCP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in April 2005 as well as the peace agreement suggested by Hu are still based on the "one China" principle. Hu's references to a shared destiny, joint decisionmaking and a mutual framework for peace and stability are not based on equality, but rather in the idea of one stronger and one weaker party, and it cannot hide that the "Anti-Secession" Law authorizes military force.
With China and the US having access to both soft and hard powers, Taiwan must strengthen the modernization of its national defense rather than hope for a thaw in cross-strait relations if it is to rest easy.
The inability of the Taiwan government and opposition parties to find a way to pass the full arms procurement bill is making some in Washington doubt Taiwan's determination to defend itself.
In September 2005, then US deputy assistant secretary of defense Richard Lawless said that Taiwan could not rely on the US alone to stave off threats and that the Taiwan Relations Act stipulated that both Taiwan and the US had to fulfill their responsibilities by deterring invaders or other threats.
Edward Ross, principal director for Security Cooperation Operations of the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency, was even more blunt, saying that Taiwan's procrastination on the special arms procurement bill meant that the US needed to reconsider the degree of intervention it was prepared to offer to help defend Taiwan.
In the same year, the US Senate's Committee on Armed Services chairman Senator John Warner and the Congressional Taiwan Caucus' co-chair, Representative Steve Chabot, said that many members of Congress were re-evaluating their support for defending Taiwan.
Although political considerations lay behind US President George W. Bush's decision not to approve the sale of F-16 C/D fighter aircraft that Taiwan wanted, it was also connected to Taiwan's inability to pass part of the arms procurement budget.
The KMT's white paper on national defense was a declaration of its an intent to make Taiwan "solid as a rock," but it was restricted to defensive strategies and showed no intent to develop effective weapons systems capable of resisting China.
The number of times the KMT and the People First Party have voted down the special arms procurement bill in the legislature is quite impressive. The KMT wants defense policy to be adjusted to reflect changes in cross-strait relations, and has publicly said that the arms procurement bill had to be reconsidered as a result of the mechanism for building mutual military trust mentioned in the communique between Hu and former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰).
Several public opinion polls show that KMT supporters take a more cautious view of the special arms procurement budget.
Although the KMT agreed to raise the defense budget to 3 percent of GDP, voters should look at the party's consistency over time and whether its actions coincide with what it says.
Other things to look for is whether the party will work actively to improve cross-strait relations or sacrifice Taiwan's defense security, perhaps even abandoning the research and development of counter-strike weapons.
Lin Cheng-yi is a research fellow at the Institute of European and American Studies at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS