Most teenagers are probably ignorant of political issues, such as China's "Anti-Secession" Law and the arms procurement budget, and hedge on these issues. They detest politics because they think it is a filthy game manipulated by the rich and the powerful. Many also assume that politicians are unscrupulous and tend to make radical, biased comments.
Some people think that young people's political apathy stems from their disdain for politicians. But is the lack of interest really due to their negative impression of politicians? Many teenagers criticize gossip, but still relish it.
Some people also think that teenagers' political apathy comes from the perception that their opinions do not matter and will not affect government policymaking. They contend that teenagers steer clear of political discussions because of a feeling of powerlessness. But while students do not have power to change school policy, they can be very vocal in criticizing the policy if it threatens their rights.
I believe many youngsters eschew political discussions because they are insensible to and have little knowledge of political issues. They are incapable of judging political issues or contributing ideas because they do not have a perspective on these issues. Not knowing how to form an opinion or judge a political issue, they choose to escape politics altogether.
Many youngsters say they don't have any political beliefs, claiming that it will influence their judgment on political issues and people will consider them biased. In Taiwan, people who voice their political beliefs openly, are quickly categorized as belonging to the pan-green or pan-blue camp.
When a person criticizes a party, people seldom really think about the comment itself but are eager to know which side the person stands for. Some teachers and parents teach their children not to give voice to their political inclination lest they be called biased. They believe that people who do not have a strong political stand are more accepting of public opinion and can judge political issues more objectively based on facts. But does taking a stand really make a person subjective and biased? Holding an opinion allows a person to develop a personal stand on issues. It forces people to think and to develop insight.
The public tends to put their trust in people who are said to be objective. But what constitutes objectivity? Many think that a person who does not clearly favor any party is objective and thus makes comments based on facts and is not swayed by personal beliefs and feelings. However, there is the risk that a public commentator might be expressing an opinion that caters more to public taste rather than the truth. Pandering to the public is risky, as public opinion can be easily manipulated by the mass media or certain influential organizations.
Chang Jung-sheng
Tainan
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
Philippine Coast Guard spokesman Jay Tarriela on March 1 was promoted from commodore to rear admiral from Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The promotion is a striking testament to how Beijing’s intimidation tactics on its current main target in the South China Sea have backfired. It is also yet another example that Taiwan can look to when it comes to responding to Chinese scare campaigns. Tarriela has been consistent in his approach since Manila launched its transparency initiative in early 2023 to counter Chinese “gray zone” tactics around its western waters. As the face of the West Philippine Sea Transparency Office,
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.