Chronic hunger affects some 850 million people in the world, while hunger and poverty combined claim around 25,000 lives every day. To remind us of this unacceptable tragedy, the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FOA) celebrated its annual World Food Day with the slogan "The Right to Food."
But the FAO should have paid more attention to the rights that matter most for "landless farmers, urban slum dwellers ? and the extremely poor" -- the right to own and exchange property and the right to trade freely, both locally and internationally.
The good intentions of World Food Day on Oct. 16 fail to address seriously the real causes of hunger, famine and poverty.
FOA Director-General Jacques Diouf rhetorically asked: "If our planet produces enough food to feed its entire population, why do 854 million people still go to sleep on an empty stomach?"
The answer is destructive government policies.
In the name of subsistence farmers and the hungry, many governments have taken control of agriculture, only to leave it damaged and unprofitable. Food marketing boards, protectionist trade barriers and heavy tariffs have all made farmers poorer, reduced crop yields and hurt consumers.
These barriers prevent farmers from selling their produce for a profit -- eventually leaving both consumers and farmers hungry. During famines and food crises, the damage that arbitrary barriers cause to health and life becomes only too visible.
During the famine in Kenya last year, crops were abundant in the western part of the country while people in the north were starving. This is not unique and will unfortunately be repeated until markets are allowed to work, unfettered by government policies.
Barriers to trade also prevent farmers from having access to agricultural technologies like pesticides, fertilizer and hybrid seeds that could drastically reduce backbreaking labor while improving crop yields. In a single crop season, it takes sub-Saharan subsistence farmers anywhere between 60 to 120 days just to weed a field.
Nowhere is the average import tariff on agricultural products higher than in sub-Saharan Africa. The average 33.6 percent tariff raises prices beyond the grasp of those who need it most -- the 70 percent of people who live off the land.
Fertilizer can cost Africans six times the world price.
Heads of state and government from more than 40 African Union nations agreed at the Abuja Fertilizer Summit in June last year that "as an immediate measure, the elimination of taxes and tariffs on fertilizer and fertilizer raw materials is recommended."
More than a year later, there is still no report of progress -- and barriers to regional trade in all products remain among the highest in the world.
Hunger affects all sectors of life. Without adequate and nutritious food, people are unable to work, raise their families, go to school or resist diseases.
The best way to reach so-called food security is to ensure that people have the freedom and the rights to provide for themselves and their families. Not only should governments stop interfering with agriculture and pursuing the chimera of self-sufficiency, they should also recognize that human beings are at their most capable and responsible when free.
The right to own and exchange property would encourage farmers to invest more time and money into their land. More farmers would use agricultural technologies if they were confident that they would retain the returns on their investments.
Secure land tenure would also allow farmers to obtain loans from banks by using their land as collateral. This would allow them to invest to improve their farming business, to start up new businesses or to simply ensure their families' good health, education and wellbeing.
Upholding property rights and enabling people to operate businesses in order to sell goods and services would significantly reduce hunger. These policies may seem unrelated to food but they are intimately related to the freedoms that farmers need to produce food and earn a living.
By contrast, continued intervention by governments or international agencies has kept farmers hungry and unproductive, creating those hungry millions.
The FAO is right to say governments should "create peaceful, stable, free and prosperous environments in which people can feed themselves in dignity."
But that means strengthening people's control over their own lives, land and work -- not government control.
Caroline Boin is a research fellow in the environment program at International Policy Network, an educational think tank based in London.
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
RSS