Mourning for late gang boss Chen Chi-li (
Chen was the leader of the Bamboo Union, which, along with the Four Seas, was one of the largest "Mainlander" gangs in Taiwan, so called because members were mostly school dropouts and other troublesome scions of Mainlander families. Many of those families also happened to have close ties to the military. Children who grew up in these communities had a strong sense of unity, which played a large role in the birth of some of the gangs.
Some might find it difficult to understand how these gangs became involved with secret government missions and, for all intents and purposes, turned into an unofficial enforcement arm of the KMT. But given their close ties with the military, many gang members strongly identified with the Greater China ideology and the Republic of China. Their family connections meant that government officials gained easy access to rising gang members.
As international pressure increased during the 1960s and 1970s, the KMT found it increasingly difficult to openly crack down on dissent. It therefore turned to criminal gangs to help maintain order.
Chen, who is mostly known for his role in the assassination of writer Henry Liu (
On the eve of Chen's funeral, action movie star Jimmy Wang (
Despite the reprehensible nature of these two cases, they are merely the tip of the iceberg. Many other such stories are waiting to be told.
During Chen's funeral, friends and associates praised him for the "sacrifices" he made for the country.
But the victims of these repellent actions were mostly civilians who happened to oppose the policies and practices of the government at the time.
In response to President Chen Shui-bian's (
Only through an honest exploration of past mistakes can such mistakes be avoided in the future. Ma's double standard casts doubt on whether he is indeed the right person to revamp the KMT.
And one cannot help wonder whether a party that resorts to gangs and private assassination squads -- or that fails to distance itself from such practices -- can ever regain genuine trust in the community.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS