When Nicolas Sarkozy became president of France, he declared that his country was back in mainstream Europe. Since then, Sarkozy has thrown himself into the European political fray.
His energy -- combined with the negotiating talents of German Chancellor Angela Merkel -- overcame antagonism toward the new reform treaty that EU leaders just ratified in Lisbon, putting the EU back on its feet after two years of crippling indecision.
But this triumph marked only a partial return by France to the European fold.
The French must now resolve their own ambiguous attitudes about Europe, which have affected national policies for decades.
For half a century, France has mixed two radically different approaches to Europe. Some French see the EU as a community where national interests inexorably converge.
At the other extreme is the Gaullist belief that the EU is nothing more than a "power multiplier" for France to defend its own national interests.
Rather than using Europe to project French ideas across the continent, France needs to develop a culture of genuine power-sharing and compromise. Such a sea change would have profound implications for French policies across a broad spectrum, from internal EU issues and economics to foreign policy and Europe's role in the world.
Consider the French executive. The president and government ministers treat Europe as their political preserve. Yet the prime minister never attends EU meetings and the foreign minister systematically leaves internal EU decisions to a junior secretary of state or a diplomatic representative.
Meanwhile, other ministers circumvent government instructions to get from Brussels what has been refused in Paris. Clearly, a better EU policymaking system needs to be found.
For a start, the French parliament must be given a greater role and government ministers must drop their habit of blaming Brussels whenever they want to introduce unpopular economic or social reforms.
Sarkozy is particularly eager for France to be heard on economic policy. His election victory relied heavily on his plans to reform the labor market and to promote work and innovation.
But if France is to be taken seriously by the rest of Europe, Sarkozy will have to deliver more than just growth and jobs. He will need to demonstrate that France no longer treats Europe as a scapegoat for its own economic troubles -- a ploy that merely marginalizes France in economic debates.
Thus, polemics against the European Central Bank's independence and the damaging effect of "the high euro" will have to stop.
France's financial credentials will also have to improve if ministers' views on EU monetary issues are to be taken seriously. For years, France has funded some of the highest public spending in Europe through budget deficits, despite its commitment to balance the books as part of the EU's Stability and Growth Pact.
Many EU members fear that Sarkozy's government will again break French budget promises, as his demands for growth-boosting tax cuts imply pushing back the deadline for eliminating France's deficit to 2012.
Similarly, French prudence will be under scrutiny during discussions of a new European financial framework, which will test France's capacity to view EU budgets as something other than a means of redistributing EU cash, particularly to farmers.
The Common Agricultural Policy still accounts for more than 40 percent of community expenditure, even though the farm sector accounts for only 2 percent of employment.
As for global security, it is clear that EU countries can exert international influence only when they speak with one voice.
France must sort out its relations with NATO and the role it intends to play in trans-Atlantic forums.
This means dropping anti-American rhetoric and talk about "European power," which is meaningless for the majority of EU states.
French and German disagreements with the US in 2003 generated deep divisions in the EU.
But recent changes in political leadership in Britain, France and Germany, together with the arrival of a new US administration in early 2009, could improve trans-Atlantic cooperation.
Next, France and the EU must find a new model for dealing with Russia. Here, the EU is confronted with a dilemma. Does it consider Russia a powerful partner or a hostile neighbor?
If France wants to take the lead on EU relations with Moscow, it must become far more sensitive to eastern and central European fears about Russia.
French politicians underestimate the negative impact they have in these countries when they repeatedly refer to a Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis and criticize "excessive" enthusiasm for the trans-Atlantic alliance.
Sarkozy will need to take all this into account if he wants France to play a full part in shaping the EU's future.
France's elites need to own up to the mistakes of the past and find better ways to confront today's challenges.
Ordinary French people also have much to consider: our attitudes toward the market, our relations with the rest of Europe and our views about the world beyond the EU's borders.
If we come to terms with today's complex realities, France could be back in Europe.
Thierry Chopin is director of studies at the Robert Schuman Foundation and professor at the College d'Europe in Bruges, Belgium.
Copyright: Project Syndicate/Europe's World
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights