On Sept. 28, EVA Airways Corp said that as of Nov. 23 it would no longer offer flights from Taipei to Paris, a service it had provided for 14 years.
The company gave many reasons for this decision, from the cost of entering Russian airspace becoming too high to increases in the price of fuel to it not having the Fifth Freedom of the Air, which would give it the right to fly passengers from a second to a third country.
Industry watchers said flights to Europe for both national airlines -- EVA Airways and China Airlines -- were generating revenue losses.
It is sad that EVA Airways had to cancel its flights to Paris because of business difficulties. But times have changed.
When EVA started its service to Paris in 1993, Taiwan was in the middle of its economic miracle. Its foreign reserve was second only to Japan's.
Three European countries also at the height of their economic power -- the UK, France and Germany -- were all eager to establish direct flights to and from Taiwan.
But all good things come to an end. The ensuing enthusiasm for China among Taiwanese businesses prompted the quick growth of the Chinese economy. This in turn led many Taiwanese businesses to invest in China, to such an extent that China's gains became Taiwan's losses.
From that point onwards, Taiwan's development of the European market began to stagnate. The percentage of exports to Europe as a part of total Taiwanese exports went down 17.1 percent from 1992. The government's active opening policy in 2001 accelerated this trend, and the percentage of Taiwanese exports to Europe went down from 16.3 percent in 2001 to 12.3 percent last year.
Stagnating trade with Europe naturally led to a decline of business travelers to and from Europe. Under such circumstances, any increase in cost, such as the cost of using another country's airspace, or the price of fuel, can be the straw that breaks the camel's back.
The demise of EVA Airways' flights to Paris once again proves the cruel truth that too much investment in China is not good for the international position of Taiwanese companies.
Taiwan's shrinking market share in Europe inevitably influenced its visibility there. While the market share of Taiwanese exports to the European market declined every year, from 3.08 percent in 1999 to 2.69 percent last year, China's share increased, from 4.67 percent in 1999 to 19.7 percent last year.
More European companies abandoned Taiwan and started trading with China. It was a natural development, therefore, for them to make Shanghai their new hub for East Asian business and there was very little Taiwan could do about it. After all, business is about making profit.
This also influenced European governments and over time the number of European countries friendly to Taiwan decreased, as did the voices speaking in the defense of Taiwan. This is the reason Taiwan has become increasingly marginalized globally.
When the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power in 2000, Taiwan swept away all the evils left over from the colonial era and began developing a comprehensive policy for the globalization of the economy.
Who would have thought that the DPP government could have been brainwashed by the education system and the media and sought to be close to China?
The old "no haste, be patient" policy that looked pan-blue but was pan-green at heart, was thrown straight into the trash can by the new government, which instead implemented a pan-blue economic policy, in which globalization was virtually the same as entering the Chinese market. This caused an abrupt end to Taiwan's strong global position.
The market share of Taiwanese products in the world except China shrank fast. The most worrying aspect of this is the declining percentage of Taiwanese products on the US market, which went from 3.33 percent in 2000 to 2.06 percent last year, a decline of 38 percent. During the same period, Chinese products went from 8.22 percent to 15.5 percent.
As a result of this growth, China's influence on the domestic US market is growing every day. This is also one of the main reasons why Taiwan's diplomatic relations with the US have suffered in the past few years. If this situation continues, it will endanger the nation's survival.
The pan-blue camp always said that if it were not for the positive trade balance of US$27 billion with China last year, Taiwan would already have a trade deficit. Government officials never came up with a good answer to this claim, because the DPP government's economic policy is identical to that of the pan-blue camp. The only difference lies in the speed by which the policy is implemented.
Taiwanese do not know that current woes are the result of the government's pro-China trade policy, which has caused Taiwanese companies to flock to China and let Chinese companies take over international markets. The end of EVA Airlines' flights to Paris is a direct result of this policy.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.
RSS