The elimination of poverty must remain at the top of the policy agenda in Latin America and the Caribbean, where inequality is higher than in any other region and one in five people survive on little more than US$2 per day (as measured by the 1993 "purchasing power parity" exchange rate).
Poverty is an intrinsically dynamic phenomenon. Poor people are locked into a low-level asset -- or capability -- trap. Hence, poverty reduction efforts must seek to provide incentives that will encourage the poor to acquire assets and capabilities that will enable them to escape poverty.
It is impossible to make serious inroads against poverty without generating persistent economic growth. But based on the continent's economic performance over the last 15 years, growth alone is unlikely to reduce poverty by more than 25 percent in the next 10 years.
Even if policymakers were successful in creating an environment that better rewards investment and so promotes faster growth, Latin America's ills would not be solved. The high level of income inequality requires specific poverty reduction efforts.
Indeed, a striking feature of Latin America is that very little redistribution currently takes place. Taxes generally have little redistributive effect, because most countries rely heavily on indirect taxes. Even Chile's tax system -- the most effective in Latin America -- is regressive. Personal income tax revenue is low in Latin America and the Caribbean, suggesting that there is scope for policymakers to increase intake so that they have more money to distribute to those in need.
There is a compelling economic case for increased public investment early in a child's life.
Severe malnutrition in early childhood harms cognitive development. Growth lost in early years is never recovered. Measures to reduce the prevalence of iron deficiency, anemia and vitamin A, iodine and zinc deficiencies -- which remain significant in some countries in the region -- would have a positive impact. Improving the nutrition of infants and young children by promoting both breastfeeding and better knowledge of weaning foods would be a cost-effective opportunity, with benefits between five and seven times higher than the costs.
Conditional cash transfers are another option for Latin American policymakers to consider. These programs are designed to reduce poverty by making welfare programs conditional upon the recipients' actions. The criteria for receiving aid may be sending children to school regularly or taking them to a doctor.
A comprehensive Mexican program called PROGRESA delivers targeted education grants for children; healthcare services and nutritional supplements for pregnant women, nursing mothers and children under five; and annual health check-ups for other household members.
In 2002, it covered one-fifth of the Mexican population, delivering payouts that added up to 20 percent of the beneficiaries' total expenditure.
Evidence from this and smaller-scale programs show significant increases in household consumption, reducing poverty in the short run, and that such programs improve school enrollment and attendance rates, although they do less for achievement levels. Research also shows that these programs improve the health of children and adults.
Moreover, there is no evidence that these programs generate major negative incentives, such as lower employment among adults or higher fertility rates.
On the contrary, there is some evidence that beneficiary households increase their participation in microenterprise activities and make larger investments in agricultural production.
These sorts of benefits are, in economic terms, worth at least twice as much as the cost of the program -- the main expense is the cash that is transferred to households.
Early childhood development projects -- designed to improve physical, intellectual and social development -- form a third effective set of redistributive policies.
A wide range of interventions belong to this category. Some, such as growth monitoring, daycare services, preschool activities or improved hygiene or health services, work directly with children.
They may also include training services for teachers and caregivers and the strengthening of institutional and community resources and capacity.
Researchers who looked at early childhood development programs in Latin America concluded that program participation is associated with improved school readiness, a higher probability of on-time primary school enrollment, lower rates of grade repetition and dropout and improved academic performance overall. The economic benefits, estimated to be between five and 19 times higher than the costs, are dramatic.
A plan to reduce poverty in Latin America and the Caribbean should go far beyond conditional cash transfers and early childhood intervention in nutrition and education.
Although there is not yet enough evidence to assess the cost-benefit ratios of specific policies, the evidence available suggests that policymakers should also prioritize improving the provision of education, creating more secure property rights through land reform, promoting microfinance and improving rural infrastructure.
Poverty rates in the region have fallen slightly in the last two decades, but to reduce the drastic levels of inequality, there needs to be a serious commitment to policies that encourage the poor to acquire the means to escape poverty. Above all, policymakers should ensure that fighting poverty remains one of their highest priorities.
Bjorn Lomborg is the organizer of Copenhagen Consensus and adjunct professor at Copenhagen Business School. Sebastian Galiani is an associate professor at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
For Taipei, last year was a particularly dangerous period, with China stepping up coercive pressures on Taiwan amid signs of US President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline, which eventually led his Democratic Party to force him to abandon his re-election campaign. The political drift in the US bred uncertainty in Taiwan and elsewhere in the Indo-Pacific region about American strategic commitment and resolve. With America deeply involved in the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, the last thing Washington wanted was a Taiwan Strait contingency, which is why Biden invested in personal diplomacy with China’s dictator Xi Jinping (習近平). The return of
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
Looking at the state of China’s economy this year, many experts have said that weak domestic demand and insufficient internal consumption might be its Achilles’ heel, with the latter being related to culture and demographics. Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2013, he has been combating extravagance and corruption as well as rectifying a bad atmosphere. China expert Stephen Roach said the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) regulatory crackdown has been targeting Chinese tycoons, such as Alibaba Group Holding Ltd founder Jack Ma (馬雲), and opposing what the CCP defines as “excessively extravagant lifestyles,” such as playing too
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use