While I assume that a majority of Taiwanese do not want to unnecessarily antagonize China, which has hundreds of missiles pointed in their direction, I can certainly understand why they would not want to be residents of China.
One only needs to look at the findings of the Freedom House, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that is a clear voice for democracy and freedom around the world. Since 1972, Freedom House has ranked political and civil rights freedom for people around the world.
According to Freedom House, Taiwan was "not free" until the lifting of martial law in 1987 and only achieved a "free" political and civil rights ranking in 1996 when the nation held its first truly free presidential election. China, in comparison, is still "not free."
As far as the supposedly autonomous regions of Tibet and Hong Kong are concerned, Tibetans live in similar "not free" conditions with even a worse score than China itself, and Hong Kong has slipped from a "free" status when it was under British rule to only "partly free," according to Freedom House's findings last year.
In coming up with its rankings, Freedom House evaluates political rights in the following three categories: electoral processes, political pluralism and participation and the functioning of government.
On the civil side it evaluates four items: freedom of expression and belief, freedom of association and organization, the rule of law and personal autonomy and civil rights.
The highest (freest) score a populace can receive is 1/1 (1 in political rights and 1 in civil rights) and the lowest (least free) is 7/7 (7 in political rights and 7 in civil rights).
The US and Tibet have the highest and lowest scores possible respectively. Taiwan (since 1996) and Japan enjoy "free" status, while China is close to the bottom and Hong Kong has moved from free to partly free with a particular decline in political rights since its changeover from British to Chinese control.
Freedom House's data also reveals that although Taiwan is officially recognized by only a small number of countries compared to those that say they recognize only "one" China -- including some which state that Taiwan is part of China -- Taiwanese enjoy political and civil freedoms only experienced by the world's most advanced democracies.
Given the fact that ordinary Taiwanese are able to travel abroad and conduct business with these same democracies and that the US has declared quite firmly that it opposes the use of military force to remove the political and civil freedoms that Taiwanese enjoy, Taiwanese appear to enjoy domestic and international freedoms which are not as negative as some residents perceive.
If one posits that Taiwanese do value their political and civil rights but do not want to antagonize China unnecessarily by declaring independence, should one not also agree that a major issue in Taiwan's elections should be whether candidates favor maintaining the freedoms Taiwanese currently enjoy or are they willing to accept China's political and civil rights standards?
The official name of the Taiwanese government seems less important than whether its leaders are fighting to maintain or even improve upon the nation's political and human-rights records.
If I were Taiwanese I would want the person for whom I am going to vote for president and who is going to represent me in the legislature to answer the following questions:
* Are you committed to continuing the rights of Taiwanese to vote for their president and legislators in totally free, multiparty elections?
* Are you committed to maintaining the nation's air and naval forces at levels strong enough to deter any attempt to prevent the self-determination of free Taiwanese by military force?
* Are you willing to support a "US Relations Act" reciprocating US support for the right of Taiwanese to self-determination by pledging that Taiwan will view any attempt to determine the future of the nation by other than peaceful means -- including by boycotts or embargoes -- a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of grave concern to the Taiwanese people?
* Given that Taiwanese have been free from martial law for more than two decades, have enjoyed high levels of political and civil rights for a decade and are able to travel and do business freely, are you willing to forgo statements and actions challenging other countries' claims that Taiwan is part of China in favor of exerting efforts to ensure that Taiwan's political and civil freedoms continue?
If a candidate is willing to answer these questions affirmatively, I would seriously considering giving that candidate my vote.
Jim Auer is director of the Center for US-Japan Studies and Cooperation at Vanderbilt University.
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
RSS