Another Double Ten national celebration has rolled around, and so it is appropriate to reflect on the circumstances Taiwan finds itself in on this symbolically confusing day.
The unusually aggressive display of military technology planned for today's parade is notable, but the lack of unity between the government and the opposition parties on even fundamental matters such as the need to strengthen the nation's defenses undercuts all the pomp.
We noted last year that beyond the hardware, these nationalist displays have a hollow core and that nationalism is ill-served by symbols and rhetoric that simply serve as face-saving mechanisms for organs of state. Meanwhile, the alternative -- that Taiwan is part of China and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is the natural party to rule all of China -- is so discredited now that even chunks of the KMT cannot bring themselves to spout it in public.
By and large, however, Taiwan is chugging along nicely, with solid economic credentials and growth, even if inflationary pressures are building. Shunting aside media hyperbole, Taiwan remains one of the safest countries in the world, with encouraging standards of education, growing (if erratically distributed) income and a good international reputation in various sectors.
In recent years the picture of Taiwan in the international eye has bounced back and forth between the predatory neuroses of China and the political mandates of competing foreign-affairs factions in the US -- the balance of which has not helped Taiwan to expand its global space.
Politically, the public has grown to more or less accept the ramifications of the executive-legislative gridlock, so much so that the prospect of another four years of this state of affairs seems not to disturb too many people.
Because the next legislative race will almost certainly end in a KMT-controlled floor, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must concentrate its rhetorical and financial resources in retaining the executive. For the DPP, this "gridlock" scenario is something that it will have to accept indefinitely, short of a KMT schism or a revolution in grassroots politics -- a responsibility that the DPP seems unable and unwilling to embrace.
In the meantime, Taiwanese will look on the national day with a degree of skepticism. But it is also true that the things that unite Taiwanese of all backgrounds are growing more numerous, even if they are not always so spectacular. Unified and large-scale displays of nationalism will have to wait.
The more subtle displays of nationalism are encouraging, but intriguingly place excessive stock in expatriates: the travails of baseballer Wang Chien-ming (
This suggests that many Taiwanese feel they and their activities can only be successful and credible as "Taiwanese" if judged against a global standard. We welcome the day when this residue of colonial-era abuse can finally be erased and Taiwanese can derive pride and inspiration from simply being themselves.
In the closing weeks of 2000, an army of Singaporean government officials descended on Washington to make good on a handshake between then-US President Bill Clinton and Singaporean Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟). They had agreed to strike an FTA after a round of golf in Brunei that past November. Running a small city-state, Singapore’s leaders and their diplomats live with their ear to the ground, attuned to the slightest geopolitical movements. They were motivated then by a big-picture strategic concern — keeping the US embedded in their region. An FTA they thought would help do that. It worked. Clinton’s successor,
On Oct. 7, the Chinese embassy in New Delhi sent letters to the Indian media asking them to refrain from calling Taiwan a country while reporting on its 109th National Day, which fell on Saturday last week. This move backfired and, on the contrary, contributed to the immense popularity of Taiwan among Indians, leading to an outpouring of congratulations for it on Twitter. Asked about the letter, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs said: “There is a free media that reports on issues as it sees fit.” Bharatiya Janata Party spokesman Tajinder Singh Bagga put up several banners outside the
On Oct. 6, the UN Committee on Human Rights released a statement on the concentration camps in China’s Xinjiang region in which at least 1 million Uighurs and other ethnic minorities are incarcerated. On the same day, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was telling delegates at a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) meeting that “happiness among the people in Xinjiang is on the rise.” It was a stark reminder of the CCP’s longstanding practice of trampling on human rights and deceiving the world. In October last year, the Taiwan East Turkestan Association and the Taiwan Friends of Tibet held an event titled
In a Facebook post on Wednesday last week, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City Councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) wrote: “The KMT must fall for Taiwan to improve.’ Allow me to ask the question again: Is this really true?” It matters not how many times Hsu asks the question, my answer will always be the same: “Yes, the KMT must be toppled for Taiwan to improve.” In the lengthy Facebook post, titled “What were those born in the 1980s guilty of?” Hsu harked back to the idealistic aspirations of the 2014 Sunflower movement before heaping opprobrium on the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)