I was stunned to read in the China Times that the government is to downgrade social education centers. In the last few years the government has been making noises about organizational re-engineering, but it seems they have only been thinking in terms of institutions involved in "social education."
It is as though these unfortunate institutions are the only obstacles the government sees, and since the government is not able to disband them altogether as it would like, it is left with the option of either driving them out or suppressing them.
For a start, "social education institution" is just a convenient term as these institutions come under the administrative auspices of the Department of Social Education of the Ministry of Education. You only have to have the slightest connection with museums -- especially the national level museums -- to know that they perform an array of important functions that cannot be done by any other institutions, particularly when it comes to academic research.
The majority of advanced nations in the West use their museums as yardsticks of the country's culture, and this is why national museums tend to be found in the center of capital cities, or in the public spaces that most symbolize political power.
For example, the renowned Smithsonian complex lies at the opposite end of the Mall from the US Capitol in Washington, London's museums are concentrated in South Kensington, central Berlin has the Museumsinsel (Museum Island) and the Hofburg Imperial Palace in Vienna houses several important museums. Furthermore, the French president had the final say when it came to the construction of major contemporary museums in Paris.
All of this goes to show that these countries view their museums as symbols of national cultural progress. Social education is but one of the functions they perform.
Three decades ago Taiwan embarked on a program of cultural construction, and the ministry officially announced a construction project for national level museums, having noted the high status accorded to museums in Western countries. Nevertheless, even though these museums were given level three status, they were still at the mercy of the whims of the government minister, and did not have the freedom to decide their own future.
Fortunately, a number of ministers at the time did, in fact, respect the decisions of those in charge, and so the construction projects progressed relatively smoothly.
Strictly speaking, the fact that the government's Research, Development and Evaluation Commission gave the national museums legal status as a person was a step in the right direction. However, too little attention was paid to the organizational details of this status during the actual legislative process, and the government also failed to make adequate provision for running costs, leading to opposition because of the perceived difficulties of running the institutions.
Why exactly the government decided against amending the draft legislation that would have made the museums independent, self-governing cultural institutions, as is the case in the UK and the US, just makes the mind boggle.
What advantages are there to be had from downgrading these institutions to level four? Actually, there is only one, and that is that it makes it easier for the ministry to throw its weight around. In the past it was difficult for the ministry to do what it pleased because level three institutions are protected by organic law. When the institutions are downgraded, the minister can have directors do as he wants.
There is an unwritten principle in modern democratic societies that the government should not intervene in the arts or in education. Such is the case when the British government provides funding for state universities like Oxford and Cambridge, but stays out of how they are run.
It is the same for cultural and arts institutions: The government provides funding but does not designate who is to be the director. They have even set up intermediary bodies to issue the funding in an effort to prevent government intervention, to keep the government "at arm's length."
Although this principle is not followed explicitly in Taiwan, in the past ministers have by and large recognized the importance of the spirit behind it and have done their best to maintain a hands-off policy. Today, however -- in the interests of convenience for ministers -- heads of cultural and arts institutions can be replaced at the drop of a hat. To some, this may well smack of thought control.
So the problems that will be caused by the downgrading from level three to level four will be more than just the possibility of museum talent jumping ship, or certain civil servants being treated unfairly. I believe that the greatest impact in terms of personnel will be in the senior levels of the museum hierarchy because as the status of these institutions fall, people with their own ideals and true academic status will sever their ties with them.
Who wants to work in management in an institution that has lost its autonomy, and which is subject to commandments from arrogant and overbearing masters? Put another way, government ministers will likely be quite happy to place "yes men" in management positions in these institutions. If these institutions are, in fact, downgraded, we will lose the independence of culture and the arts.
Han Pao-teh is director of the Museum of World Religions.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The EU’s biggest banks have spent years quietly creating a new way to pay that could finally allow customers to ditch their Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc cards — the latest sign that the region is looking to dislodge two of the most valuable financial firms on the planet. Wero, as the project is known, is now rolling out across much of western Europe. Backed by 16 major banks and payment processors including BNP Paribas SA, Deutsche Bank AG and Worldline SA, the platform would eventually allow a German customer to instantly settle up with, say, a hotel in France
On August 6, Ukraine crossed its northeastern border and invaded the Russian region of Kursk. After spending more than two years seeking to oust Russian forces from its own territory, Kiev turned the tables on Moscow. Vladimir Putin seemed thrown off guard. In a televised meeting about the incursion, Putin came across as patently not in control of events. The reasons for the Ukrainian offensive remain unclear. It could be an attempt to wear away at the morale of both Russia’s military and its populace, and to boost morale in Ukraine; to undermine popular and elite confidence in Putin’s rule; to
A traffic accident in Taichung — a city bus on Sept. 22 hit two Tunghai University students on a pedestrian crossing, killing one and injuring the other — has once again brought up the issue of Taiwan being a “living hell for pedestrians” and large vehicle safety to public attention. A deadly traffic accident in Taichung on Dec. 27, 2022, when a city bus hit a foreign national, his Taiwanese wife and their one-year-old son in a stroller on a pedestrian crossing, killing the wife and son, had shocked the public, leading to discussions and traffic law amendments. However, just after the
The international community was shocked when Israel was accused of launching an attack on Lebanon by rigging pagers to explode. Most media reports in Taiwan focused on whether the pagers were produced locally, arousing public concern. However, Taiwanese should also look at the matter from a security and national defense perspective. Lebanon has eschewed technology, partly because of concerns that countries would penetrate its telecommunications networks to steal confidential information or launch cyberattacks. It has largely abandoned smartphones and modern telecommunications systems, replacing them with older and relatively basic communications equipment. However, the incident shows that using older technology alone cannot
RSS