In your article "Ma reiterates vow to open cross-strait transport if elected" (page 3, Oct. 1), it is claimed that "China-bound investment is capped at 40 percent of a company's net worth."
This is just one instance of an oft-repeated mistake, if not an outright lie -- a blind repetition of a politically convenient and malicious simplification of the current laws regarding investment in China by Taiwanese companies.
First, it is hardly ever noted that this limit only applies to public companies. In Taiwan, where small and medium businesses form the majority of companies, this is a relatively small percentage.
Second, it is not true that investment is capped at 40 percent of a company's net worth -- only capital raised in Taiwan counts. Larger companies in Taiwan almost always have much more capital in financial markets such as the US and Hong Kong. The restriction does not apply to any of that capital. Nor does any restriction apply to profits made in China, which can be reinvested freely.
The Democratic Progressive Party has engaged in a policy of "opening, with exceptions" and few of the old restrictions remain. The exceptions, besides the obvious defense industry restrictions, are in semiconductor manufacturing and LCD panel manufacturing -- areas in which Taiwan has been and continues to be a strong player. It should also be noted that United Microelectronics Corp has attempted to illegally circumvent the remaining restrictions.
Its larger, more successful competitor, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, has made no moves to invest in China, and founder Morris Chang said recently that debate over "opening" is a red-herring issue (假議題) taking attention away from the true keys to sustained economic competitiveness -- creativity and innovation.
The government should ease restrictions on setting up older-generation semiconductor plants in China, but this is one small step in a very broad policy of opening to China.
Taiwan's China-bound investment continues to be among the top of all foreign investors in China and two-way trade continues to climb to new heights.
I urge the Taipei Times not to mislead readers. Give them a more complete and balanced picture of this important issue.
James Lee
Hsinchu
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
RSS