I've always stressed the importance of reciprocal Taiwan-US student exchange programs to my colleagues and fellow academics in Taiwan, so, no matter what, it is good news that Taoyuan County and the University of Texas at Dallas recently signed an agreement to exchange up to 50 students per year.
Yet, what annoys me about the deal is the way Taoyuan County decided to pitch their program using a familiar China-centric formula. In a newspaper report that followed the Sept. 11 signing of the agreement, Taoyuan County Commissioner Chu Li-lun (
Pardon me, Mr Commissioner, but shouldn't we be saying that Taiwan is a great place to come to learn about Taiwanese -- not Chinese -- culture?
The county's attitude is frustrating to me as an educator in Taiwan, because I often see Taiwanese people who appear to be ashamed of their own (Taiwanese) culture, yet very proud of being "Chinese" (even though most have never set foot in China). To them, Taiwanese culture doesn't exist. For instance, my students are shocked and a little embarrassed when I tell them there are actually lots of young people in other countries who are interested specifically in Taiwan, and Taiwanese culture.
In Japan, these people are called "Taiwanophiles" -- counterparts of Taiwan's own "Japanophiles" -- teenagers and adults who are interested in and crave knowledge about Taiwan and its unique local culture.
Judging from the local blogosphere and numerous Internet forums on Taiwanese culture subjects, in Singapore and Hong Kong (and even in China) there are numerous young people who adore Taiwanese popular music, television and fashion. And, of course, in the US too there are many US-Born Taiwanese who'd like to know more about life in Taiwan. Many of these young people and students might be more eager to come here to learn something about Taiwanese culture -- if, that is, our government representatives would stop promoting it as a form of culture tourism into Old China.
Perhaps Chu and other officials in charge of promoting Taiwan's international student exchanges should themselves be required to pass an "Introduction to Taiwanese Culture" course (now offered at many universities in Taiwan) -- or, at least be supplied with up-to-date, post-1987, maps of their country. They should at least be required to learn that Taiwan has not been a part of so-called Chinese culture for quite some time, and actually has a unique and fascinating culture all its own -- and it's nothing to be ashamed of!
Besides which, even if one could make the case that Taiwan "is Chinese" (because the KMT dictatorship controlled Taiwan as if it were China), why on earth would today's foreign students want to come to Taiwan to learn about it? At best, it would be a watered down, twice removed Chinese culture. In fact, it would be a "Chinese culture" that had long since been absorbed into the fabric of what we ordinarily call Taiwanese culture, wouldn't it?
Ron Judy
Taoyuan County
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS