At least for purposes of public consumption, southern Africa's political leaders continue to stand by Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, despite his country's ever-deepening economic crisis, which is directly attributable to his tyrannical rule. Indeed, years of economic mismanagement have produced an unemployment rate of 80 percent, with annual inflation nearing 5,000 percent.
Though Zimbabwe was once known as "the breadbasket of Africa," many of its citizens now go hungry and depend on international food donations for survival. About 3,000 people flee the country every day, often risking their lives when crossing the crocodile-infested Limpopo River -- celebrated in Kipling's tale of How the Elephant Got Its Trunk -- and scaling a border fence to enter South Africa.
By now, emigration is more than 3 million, about a quarter of the population. Yet when Mugabe was introduced at the most recent meeting of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) in Zambia's capital, Lusaka, his fellow heads of state heartily applauded him.
There are reports that, behind the scenes, things are different. South African President Thabo Mbeki is said to be trying to negotiate a way for Mugabe to leave the scene. Yet there have been similar rumors before and it is difficult to know whether Mbeki and the other southern African leaders are finally willing to tell Mugabe that he must go. Up to now, paying their respects to him as a revolutionary leader and catering to his megalomania has been more important to them than alleviating the suffering of Zimbabweans.
The obvious way for Mugabe to leave at age 83 would be to announce that he has changed his mind about running again in the presidential election scheduled for next March. Of course, should Mugabe stand down, a fair election next March probably would not be possible. The political opposition would have little capacity to organize an effective campaign in an environment in which Mugabe has shut down independent media, rewritten electoral rules and used the police to pummel -- literally -- his adversaries.
So a period of transition would be required for a proper election to be organized under the auspices of the SADC, with support from the African Union, Europe and the US, in order to get a fair result and launch a recovery process. Yet, given the brief period that remains until the scheduled election, an announcement is required soon if a fair result is to be achieved and a recovery process launched to halt the country's slide into chaos.
A big factor in any timetable for Zimbabwe's rescue is Mbeki's tenure. He has just over a year-and-a-half to go to complete his second and final five-year term. In certain respects, he has been a success. Under his leadership, South African's multiracial democracy has been consolidated, and, in dramatic contrast to Zimbabwe, its economy is flourishing.
Yet Mbeki's achievement is severely marred by two failures. Domestically, his poor performance in addressing South Africa's HIV/AIDS epidemic will ensure that he is judged harshly. Internationally, his record is stained by his lack of leadership up to now in dealing with Zimbabwe.
Nevertheless, even at this late date, Mbeki has a chance to salvage a good part of his reputation by taking the lead in organizing a transition in Zimbabwe. But, given the amount of time a transition will take, he must act now.
Even when a transition does take place in Zimbabwe, the crisis will not be over. The country has been so devastated by the Mugabe regime that substantial international engagement will be required to put it back on its feet.
For now, however, the SADC should, at long last, tell Mugabe that he must step aside, and it should take responsibility for managing an electoral process whose result Zimbabweans will recognize as fair, thereby providing the legitimacy needed for recovery to begin.
Aryeh Neier is president of the Open Society Institute and a founder of Human Rights Watch.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS