I have often thought to myself over the last few years that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was a great civil rights leader, but not much of a president. His administration has often seemed incompetent, duplicitous and simply adrift. At times, it has even been embarrassing and cringe-inducing . The punishment that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) candidates have been suffering in opinion polls would seem to bear me out to some degree.
Having witnessed the events surrounding the push for a referendum on a UN bid under the name "Taiwan," however, I think this judgement is now in need of serious modification. What US diplomats have described as crass electioneering on the part of the DPP may, in fact, be just that. Or, it may be the DPP coming to terms with its only reason for being.
The DPP is a civil-rights party that has failed to define itself on any other issue except the monumental one regarding the right of the people of this island to determine their collective fate, a right that may or may not be recognized by the UN, the US, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), China, international law, or academic theory, but which is decreed by something higher -- nature's God perhaps.
When Chen and the DPP are forced (by any of the aforementioned) on to any ground other than the fundamental question of the right to self-determination, they are out of their element and slip into confusion and even corruption, it would seem.
Therefore, what we are witnessing may in fact be an election forcing the normalization of Taiwanese politics (considering the circumstances), not a sudden break from what the US regards as the "status quo" (which seems to be a Taiwan that is devoted to manufacturing gizmos and protecting US intellectual property rights).
What is the "status quo" in East Asia anyway? New democracies in Taiwan and South Korea, a Japan slowly normalizing in terms of foreign relations and defense, a North Korean basketcase fiddling with nuclear bombs and kidnapping foreign nationals, and a China that is growing economically and militarily in a rapid, unpredictable, and opaque fashion.
The "status quo" is what anybody makes of it at any given time. It is hardly the basis for a foreign policy of a superpower with vital interests in the region.
US reservations about what is happening here are certainly understandable, as is its need for Chinese help in protecting Japan and South Korea from the regime in Pyongyang, but the US will find that it has been outmaneuvered by the "status quo" if it cannot come up with a more creative foreign policy than one that simply appeases Beijing.
Taiwanese political and economic development will be stunted and erratic so long as such fundamental questions regarding the sovereignty are kept "undecided" by the powers that have set themselves in judgement over Taiwan.
J. Tavis Overstreet
Chiayi
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The Legislative Yuan passed legislation on Tuesday aimed at supporting the middle-aged generation — defined as people aged 55 or older willing and able to work — in a law initially proposed by Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) to help the nation transition from an aged society to a super-aged society. The law’s passage was celebrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the TPP. The brief show of unity was welcome news, especially after 10 months of political fighting and unconstitutional amendments that are damaging democracy and the constitutional order, eliciting concern
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
RSS