The failure of Taiwan and China to reach a compromise on the passage of the Olympic torch through Taiwan comes as an anti-climax.
This is because it was a foregone conclusion: The concessions Beijing required -- no displays of offensive national symbols -- were always going to be intolerable, even allowing for the pragmatism that accompanies sporting events.
This decision now takes away attention from Taiwan's identity problems and symbolic lines in the sand. And perhaps this is just as well, because the genuine focus for activists and governments of conscience everywhere is surely not Taiwan's beef with China and whether Taiwan should launch a boycott -- notwithstanding the 1,000 or so missiles pointing in our direction and regular verbal threats -- but the ritual mistreatment of Chinese nationals by their own government.
The issue of a boycott, indeed, will take a back seat as the government focuses on more pressing issues, such as re-election.
It is unlikely that Democratic Progressive Party legislators hostile to Olympic participation and their think tank colleagues will make much of an impact on public thinking for the moment. There simply isn't enough interest in the subject.
So, over to you, Mia Farrow and like-minded activists, to prick the consciences of those around the world who still have one.
This will be a big ask, because the International Olympic Committee (IOC), indifferent governments, hypocrisy-peddling national Olympic committees and sports fans with no conscience are a formidable bunch laid end to end.
But optimists should note that the Chinese government, in all its squalor, is an inadvertent friend. Unable to adapt to international sensibilities, unwilling to sincerely engage with its foes and unfailing in its refusal to show contrition for its mistakes -- past and present -- Beijing will bite at every bait that activists throw at it.
The Chinese are entitled to a feeling of pride at hosting the Games, but they are not entitled to whitewash the cruelty that their governments routinely inflict on the weakest of the citizenry -- and the reality that the Games are a principal propaganda tool for those who would continue to do so.
We look forward to the Games for this reason, and this reason only: Every display of outrage at Chinese brutality, every word of dissent and every humanitarian protest -- by local or foreigner -- will be conflated with hooliganism, separatism, splittism, terrorism and any other "ism" that comes to the mind of Beijing's propaganda squad.
The violent results will be a thick smear on the already sleazy record of the IOC and a sober illustration of the profound ugliness of the new Chinese nationalism.
And the violence will come as a rude shock for those who persist with the fantasy that China is a benevolent culture whose time for pre-eminence has returned. The slogan "genocide games" and likening Beijing 2008 to Berlin 1936 may strike some as a little theatrical, but this may be because the world has not been given a proper theater to understand China's modern nature. Until now.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS