You get what you pay for
Business pundits have recently been warning consumers that they could face higher toy prices in the wake of China's recall nightmare. All I can say is "duh."
Of course toy prices will be higher. They should have been higher to start with, had the traditional standards for toys been followed instead of sacrificing care, quality and safety in exchange for money. China manufactures a large percentage of goods for one reason -- price. The old adage "you get what you pay for" has never been truer than today, as corporations that focused solely on reducing costs to increase their competitive edge have rushed headlong into the Chinese manufacturing morass, ignoring peril after peril until a bomb explodes in the marketplace. Selling toys containing enough lead to sink a battleship or enough toxic chemicals to warrant a hazard suit is a good sign a company has gotten too deep into the world of low-cost, high-risk manufacturing.
We usually say "caveat emptor" ("let the buyer beware") to consumers, but the same applies to companies doing business in China.
But it is not enough to blame the corporations, although they must certainly shoulder a lot of the blame. Consumers are also responsible for the problems created by fierce and mindless price competition, demonstrating in sale after sale that they will buy the cheapest product, no matter how awful or dangerous it is. And this has created markets for hazardous Chinese products, as well as Chinese jobs that are hazardous to the US economy.
Cheap pajamas, bras, shoes, underwear, hardware, tools, towels and a zillion other products can kill jobs. Cheap toys, however, could harm children, so toys get more attention on the evening news, but the former problem is just as critical. Consumers choose the cheapest item from China, never asking themselves how many went to China from upstate New York or Pittsburgh or from a thousand other manufacturing towns across the US.
Hopefully, consumers will soon see labels that read "Not Made in China." The problem is truly that critical. China is a land without democratic laws, without conscience, without oversight, without government enforcement aside from executing scapegoats when a disaster occurs, without justice and without a consumer voice. In that system, quality comes last, and cost is low, resulting in tens of millions of employees toiling under some of the harshest labor conditions on the planet.
When Mrs. Jones in Wichita buys a Chinese-made toy for her grandson's birthday, she is putting someone in the US out of work, and also possibly endangering her grandchild's health. She is saving a few bucks to be sure, but is it worth it?
Consumers buy US goods because they feel they are better. Where did that concept go? Where did the demand for US quality go, or the desire to produce it?
It went to Wal-Mart, that's where, and it has been driven by prices that have been pushed lower, lower, and lower still on the backs of hapless slavelike workers in China, who are paid a pittance for hours unacceptable in the US, and on the backs of all of the factories in the US closed by companies rushing to China to shave a few extra bucks off cost.
In the beginning, Japanese goods were cheap. So were Taiwanese goods. These days, those countries, with economies and democracies, labor rights and government enforcement of laws, produce among the highest-quality goods, and pay their workers a living wage. But their factories are closing too, because to remain competitive, and to serve US markets, they must reduce costs to unacceptably low levels. Only in totalitarian China, unregulated, or willfully unregulated, can companies find the kind of cheap, almost slavelike labor necessary to produce a toy -- but as we have learned, that toy may bite.
Well, here's the only acceptable result for toy companies now: Make it in China, and we won't buy it anymore. You better get your head screwed on straight and give us quality first, at a reasonably competitive price. If you can't do that, forget it.
We'll go out back and make a toy out of a piece of wood or give the kid a cardboard box like we used to do in the good old days.
The labels that say "Made in China" should actually read "Made with potentially toxic or unsafe materials in China in factories with very low quality standards and no quality control to speak of by over-exploited workers who have few skills and no education, and who have taken away your neighbors', cousins' and old classmates' jobs."
Consumers could face higher toy prices. It's about time. There should be no market in the US for those toxic toys and thousands of other problematic products.
"Not made in China" is your best guarantee of quality and safety.
Lee Long-hwa
New York
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS