The murder of a broker for foreign teachers in Kaohsiung last week has once again brought the serious flaws that exist in the conduct of the nation's police force -- not to mention the media -- to the fore.
Each morning since the story first broke the Chinese-language media, both print and broadcast, have been filled with incredibly detailed descriptions of every aspect of the case. In some instances the newspapers revealed so much it was difficult to know whether reporters or prosecutors are conducting the investigation.
Either media organizations have very resourceful reporters or someone in the police department is leaking important information about the case to the press. For example, how could the Apple Daily obtain a picture taken during the autopsy from a surveillance camera inside the mortuary?
To call both institutions unprofessional would be an understatement.
But the worst thing is the tendency of the media to jump to conclusions in the race for exclusive reportage. If three different people had read newspapers on three different days this week, each would have believed there was a different killer. Anyone who read Monday's papers would think a Japanese woman was guilty; on Tuesday, an American man was the main suspect; but read the papers on Wednesday and a Filipina is the guilty one.
Reporting facts that could influence the outcome of a trial is illegal in many countries and should be made so here. In some ways it is a blessing that Taiwan does not have trial by jury, as in many cases the perpetrators of crimes would have no chance whatsoever of receiving a fair trial.
Another thing the case has highlighted is the media's institutionalized xenophobia. No sooner had we learned that an American was a suspect than certain newspapers began reprinting chronologies of cases where Americans have killed Taiwanese.
Then, when American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) officials showed up to provide support and advice to the man during questioning, the media went into overdrive and accused them of interference. Even the Kaohsiung police spokesman felt inclined to announce that police would not let anyone (meaning AIT officials) meddle with their investigation.
The American was later released as there was insufficient evidence linking him to the crime. But following his release, newspapers were filled with provocative headlines like "Did AIT pressure the police?" while cable news channels were running disbelieving TV captions such as "Could a small, thin Filipina really be the lone killer?"
All this occurred without a shred of credible evidence being presented. It is this kind of irresponsible journalism, coupled with a complete lack of regulation on what can and cannot be reported by media outlets during such sensitive criminal investigations, that gives the nation's media such a bad reputation.
Sensationalized reporting can lead people -- such as a victim's relatives -- to jump to the wrong conclusion, often with tragic consequences, while the publication of gory details can lead politicians to jump on the bandwagon, family members to become forensic experts and a suspect to be found guilty in the eyes of the public before an indictment has been made.
Unfortunately, the presumption of innocence is a legal right that gets short shrift in Taiwan.
People here often complain about society, saying it is stuck in a downward spiral. But until something is done at the highest levels to force police to start protecting the rights of suspects, and until the press stops behaving like a pack of wild animals fighting over scraps of meat, civil society and the rule of law can only suffer.
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in