The murder of a broker for foreign teachers in Kaohsiung last week has once again brought the serious flaws that exist in the conduct of the nation's police force -- not to mention the media -- to the fore.
Each morning since the story first broke the Chinese-language media, both print and broadcast, have been filled with incredibly detailed descriptions of every aspect of the case. In some instances the newspapers revealed so much it was difficult to know whether reporters or prosecutors are conducting the investigation.
Either media organizations have very resourceful reporters or someone in the police department is leaking important information about the case to the press. For example, how could the Apple Daily obtain a picture taken during the autopsy from a surveillance camera inside the mortuary?
To call both institutions unprofessional would be an understatement.
But the worst thing is the tendency of the media to jump to conclusions in the race for exclusive reportage. If three different people had read newspapers on three different days this week, each would have believed there was a different killer. Anyone who read Monday's papers would think a Japanese woman was guilty; on Tuesday, an American man was the main suspect; but read the papers on Wednesday and a Filipina is the guilty one.
Reporting facts that could influence the outcome of a trial is illegal in many countries and should be made so here. In some ways it is a blessing that Taiwan does not have trial by jury, as in many cases the perpetrators of crimes would have no chance whatsoever of receiving a fair trial.
Another thing the case has highlighted is the media's institutionalized xenophobia. No sooner had we learned that an American was a suspect than certain newspapers began reprinting chronologies of cases where Americans have killed Taiwanese.
Then, when American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) officials showed up to provide support and advice to the man during questioning, the media went into overdrive and accused them of interference. Even the Kaohsiung police spokesman felt inclined to announce that police would not let anyone (meaning AIT officials) meddle with their investigation.
The American was later released as there was insufficient evidence linking him to the crime. But following his release, newspapers were filled with provocative headlines like "Did AIT pressure the police?" while cable news channels were running disbelieving TV captions such as "Could a small, thin Filipina really be the lone killer?"
All this occurred without a shred of credible evidence being presented. It is this kind of irresponsible journalism, coupled with a complete lack of regulation on what can and cannot be reported by media outlets during such sensitive criminal investigations, that gives the nation's media such a bad reputation.
Sensationalized reporting can lead people -- such as a victim's relatives -- to jump to the wrong conclusion, often with tragic consequences, while the publication of gory details can lead politicians to jump on the bandwagon, family members to become forensic experts and a suspect to be found guilty in the eyes of the public before an indictment has been made.
Unfortunately, the presumption of innocence is a legal right that gets short shrift in Taiwan.
People here often complain about society, saying it is stuck in a downward spiral. But until something is done at the highest levels to force police to start protecting the rights of suspects, and until the press stops behaving like a pack of wild animals fighting over scraps of meat, civil society and the rule of law can only suffer.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in