The EU has long complained about China's poor investment environment. Take for example the case of Shin Kong Place -- a joint venture of the Shin Kong Group and the Beijing Hualian Group where the latter attempted to take over ownership -- at a time when cross-strait relations were tense.
On Sept. 11, the EU Chamber of Commerce in China, which represents European business interests there, released its seventh annual European Business in China Position Paper. This was the chamber's first position paper after China's first "five-year transitional period" following its WTO entry.
In it the chamber complains that foreign firms' investment and trade are facing increasing challenges from Chinese authorities, including protectionist measures, intellectual property right (IPR) infringements and even forced technology transfers.
At a Beijing press conference, chamber president Joerg Wuttke bluntly said: "With the continued strong growth of China's economy, the business environment remains attractive for European companies. But the investment climate is becoming more complex and challenging for foreign businesses operating in China."
"Despite real improvement in the legal and regulatory regime, companies in some sectors face new or increased requirements in areas such as technology transfer," he said.
He went on to urge the Chinese government to improve transparency.
He also said that European companies lose 20 billion euros (US$27.7 billion) in China every year, mostly due to IPR infringement and investment barriers to the telecommunications, insurance and aviation industries. Moreover, the report said Beijing began to tighten regulations on foreign investment last year, restricting foreign investment in real estate and overseas buyouts of Chinese companies.
Foreign companies have also noticed restrictions on Chinese government agencies and major industrial units buying foreign products, as well as protective measures for both local industries and enterprises. The report concludes by expressing worries over the direction of China's investment environment.
The experience of European companies should serve as a warning for Taiwanese eager to invest in China. If Beijing does not improve the transparency of its regulations, Taiwanese can do nothing but pull out after suffering financial losses and unfair treatment. Just like European firms, all we ask is to be able to invest in a non-discriminatory environment.
Chang Meng-jen is a doctoral candidate in European comparative politics at the University of Siena, Italy.
Translated by Eddy Chang
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS