When the presidents of the world's remaining superpower and the nation fast challenging for the title, US President George Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), met in Sydney on Thursday they were to discuss trade and global warming.
However, even if not on the formal agenda, both sides were likely to be considering the prickly issue of cyber warfare, following the revelation that the Pentagon suffered a major breach by hackers reportedly working for the Chinese military earlier this year.
Disclosure by the Financial Times that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) assaulted part of the Pentagon's system used by policy advisers to US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is the latest and potentially most serious breach, and it set alarm bells ringing across the US military.
The Defense Department reportedly resisted the PLA onslaught for several months, but was finally penetrated, forcing a shutdown of that part of its network for a week.
A spokesman would not comment on the assault or its source, but emphasized that any information obtained would have been unclassified. The timing of the attack, and the apparent involvement of the PLA, points to an escalation of anxiety in governments across the world.
Cyber warfare began with individuals, spread to criminal gangs, and is now reaching the realm of nation states.
The Chinese government denied the allegations, but the presidential meeting aside, Beijing is already on the defensive over its cyber activities. Last week German Chancellor Angela Merkel raised the issue of cyber warfare on an official visit to China, exhorting the government to "respect a set of game rules."
Her objections followed a report in Der Spiegel magazine that Chinese spying software had been found widely scattered through the networks of Germany's foreign and economic departments, and even in Merkel's private office.
Internet security experts have been tracking Chinese cyber warfare for several years. In 2005, US officials revealed that sweeps of US intelligence, including flight software and aircraft plans, had been going on since 2003. The hackers, codenamed Titan Rain by US investigators, were believed to be in Guangdong Province, which has a heavy concentration of PLA and was also identified by Der Spiegel as the origin of the invasion of German networks.
Last November, the US Navy reported a military computer had been attacked, probably by Chinese, though it was unclear whether the hackers were commercial or state-inspired. In July, the US Department of State was reportedly investigating a break-in affecting its work across the world; it was suggested hackers had targeted anything relating to China and North Korea, though it is possible that criminal, as opposed to political or military, hackers were using that as a front to disguise their intentions.
The threat of state-sponsored hacking is dominating the thoughts of security officials worldwide. As 120 countries may be actively pursuing cyber warfare.
China has spelled out in a white paper that what it calls "informationized armed forces" are one of the three pillars of its military strategy, setting itself the target of building a cyber army which could win such a war by 2050.
The extent of cyber warfare was underlined earlier this year when the Guardian revealed that Estonia had been almost overwhelmed by an attack that was believed to have originated inside Russia which rendered several government Web sites useless and was described by Estonian officials as a "very serious disturbance."
The US is particularly vulnerable, both because of the extent of interest in its activities around the world, and because of the sheer size of its systems. The Pentagon operates 3.5 million computers across 65 countries, including 35 internal networks.
Its most sensitive network, Siprnet, is for secret information, and is thought never to have been hacked. Non-classified information passes through the less secure Niprnet; it is one segment of this network the Chinese operation is believed to have pierced.
Though the Pentagon stressed that any e-mails intercepted would be unclassified, that does not inherently rule out disruption.
Sami Saydjari, who worked as a Pentagon cyber expert for 13 years and now runs a private company, Cyber Defence Agency, said: "If someone is able to attack information that is needed by decision makers, or that is crucial to organizing logistics and supply lines of an army on the ground, that means they can induce chaos in a nation."
It is not clear exactly how the hackers gained access to the Pentagon. It may be they deployed the principle of "elevating privilege," said Dan Haagman of the computer forensics company 7Safe.
That would involve breaking into a single, unsecured computer used for mundane administrative tasks, then using its flaws to step across to other computers higher up the chain of command.
The pattern would be similar to that used by the British hacker Gary McKinnon, currently fighting extradition to the US after allegedly breaking into Pentagon and NASA computers.
In the German case, Der Spiegel said a so-called Trojan program implanted in Microsoft Word documents and PowerPoint files had been used to infect systems.
Other ways include viruses, worms and "denial of service" attacks, where a computer system is bombarded with so much information it becomes inoperable.
"We have gone well beyond teenagers who want their egos boosted. We're now into the organized kind of state activity that is truly serious," said Jody Westby at CyLab based at Carnegie Mellon University.
The US strategic commander, General James Cartwright, has said previously that the US military's defense against cyber warfare was disjointed, passive and "dysfunctional."
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on