How the US blundered
When push comes to shove, the US' highly acclaimed democracy-centered foreign policy is only worth a 50 minute pitstop or less.
This is exactly all that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the democratically elected president of Taiwan, was allotted after his 10-hour flight from Taiwan stopped to refuel in Anchorage, Alaska, before commencing another eight-hour flight to Honduras on Aug. 21.
In Honduras, Chen held a summit with the nation's Latin American allies.
Normally, without Chinese influence, US administrations would have gladly welcomed visits from Taiwan's democratic leaders and encouraged their pursuit of freedom and democracy.
In recent years, under direct pressure from the Chinese government, the US has yielded to Beijing's tyrannical demands by greatly restricting the visits of elected Taiwanese leaders.
The so-called "transit stop privilege" granted Taiwanese high officials was reduced from a 3-day stay in major cities in 48 states to a 50 minute pit-stop on the tarmac in Anchorage, where the shining glow of Taiwan's vibrant democracy cannot disturb the interactions between the leader of the free world and the dictator of the underworld.
If this trend continues, Taiwanese officials may in future expect nothing more than aerial refueling privileges.
The Anchorage episode is particularly troubling as it was orchestrated less than a month after the US House of Representatives unanimously passed a resolution calling on the Bush administration to lift its restrictions on visits to the US by high-level Taiwanese officials.
The US State Department, heavily bullied by the Chinese, was not pleased with the Taiwanese pursuit of UN membership and the referendum on that issue.
This incident and the criticism by US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte on Taiwan's proposal to apply for UN membership led people to question whether the US still stands for freedom and democracy, and whether there might not be secret, underhanded dealings between State Department officials and their Chinese counterparts to sacrifice Taiwan's democracy.
Regardless, what happened in Anchorage reflects poorly upon the State Department.
The US administration's ill-treatment of the president of Taiwan to appease the dictators in China is not only an insult to the 23 million Taiwanese, but also disgraces the spirit of freedom and democracy long upheld and prized by the American public.
The State Department's recent actions are clearly anti-democracy and undermine US leadership in the Free World.
The US State Department owes an apology for this despicable mistake to the US House of Representatives and in particular to the people of Taiwan, who still aspire to replicate the freedom and democracy that, among a handful of other countries, the US represents.
Stan Yang
Laguna Hills, California
The limits of truth
The letter by Huang Jei-hsuan did a commendable job showing that Taiwanese have the undeniable right to establish their own country (Letters, Sept. 5, page 8).
Sadly, however, I cannot agree with Huang on one thing: The truth will not set Taiwan free.
True, it can help, but in the end only Taiwanese themselves hold the key to their freedom.
Forty-five years ago I had an opportunity to visit Texas and study its history.
To my amazement, I discovered that Texas once had been an independent country called the Republic of Texas (1835 to 1845).
In 1845, The Republic of Texas concluded negotiations with the US and became its 28th state.
The negotiations were conducted on a state-to-state, equal footing basis.
As a result, Texas was able to retain the right to secede from the union whenever Texans saw fit -- something it did when it broke away and joined the south during the Civil War.
This gives me hope that Taiwanese will one day succeed in establishing a country and join the international community.
Only then can we negotiate with other countries and safeguard our interests. Anything short of that is unconditional surrender.
Tony Chen
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania
A Canadian alternative
The editorial on the problems Taiwanese companies have run into in China points to a very obvious fact ("We walk on thin ice in China," Sept. 5, page 8).
Bluntly put, my answer to this is, What in hell did you expect?
Instead, I would suggest Taiwan turn to the safest, most democratic and friendly country in the world: Canada.
Don Corrigan
Stoney Creek, Ontario";
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS