How the US blundered
When push comes to shove, the US' highly acclaimed democracy-centered foreign policy is only worth a 50 minute pitstop or less.
This is exactly all that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the democratically elected president of Taiwan, was allotted after his 10-hour flight from Taiwan stopped to refuel in Anchorage, Alaska, before commencing another eight-hour flight to Honduras on Aug. 21.
In Honduras, Chen held a summit with the nation's Latin American allies.
Normally, without Chinese influence, US administrations would have gladly welcomed visits from Taiwan's democratic leaders and encouraged their pursuit of freedom and democracy.
In recent years, under direct pressure from the Chinese government, the US has yielded to Beijing's tyrannical demands by greatly restricting the visits of elected Taiwanese leaders.
The so-called "transit stop privilege" granted Taiwanese high officials was reduced from a 3-day stay in major cities in 48 states to a 50 minute pit-stop on the tarmac in Anchorage, where the shining glow of Taiwan's vibrant democracy cannot disturb the interactions between the leader of the free world and the dictator of the underworld.
If this trend continues, Taiwanese officials may in future expect nothing more than aerial refueling privileges.
The Anchorage episode is particularly troubling as it was orchestrated less than a month after the US House of Representatives unanimously passed a resolution calling on the Bush administration to lift its restrictions on visits to the US by high-level Taiwanese officials.
The US State Department, heavily bullied by the Chinese, was not pleased with the Taiwanese pursuit of UN membership and the referendum on that issue.
This incident and the criticism by US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte on Taiwan's proposal to apply for UN membership led people to question whether the US still stands for freedom and democracy, and whether there might not be secret, underhanded dealings between State Department officials and their Chinese counterparts to sacrifice Taiwan's democracy.
Regardless, what happened in Anchorage reflects poorly upon the State Department.
The US administration's ill-treatment of the president of Taiwan to appease the dictators in China is not only an insult to the 23 million Taiwanese, but also disgraces the spirit of freedom and democracy long upheld and prized by the American public.
The State Department's recent actions are clearly anti-democracy and undermine US leadership in the Free World.
The US State Department owes an apology for this despicable mistake to the US House of Representatives and in particular to the people of Taiwan, who still aspire to replicate the freedom and democracy that, among a handful of other countries, the US represents.
Stan Yang
Laguna Hills, California
The limits of truth
The letter by Huang Jei-hsuan did a commendable job showing that Taiwanese have the undeniable right to establish their own country (Letters, Sept. 5, page 8).
Sadly, however, I cannot agree with Huang on one thing: The truth will not set Taiwan free.
True, it can help, but in the end only Taiwanese themselves hold the key to their freedom.
Forty-five years ago I had an opportunity to visit Texas and study its history.
To my amazement, I discovered that Texas once had been an independent country called the Republic of Texas (1835 to 1845).
In 1845, The Republic of Texas concluded negotiations with the US and became its 28th state.
The negotiations were conducted on a state-to-state, equal footing basis.
As a result, Texas was able to retain the right to secede from the union whenever Texans saw fit -- something it did when it broke away and joined the south during the Civil War.
This gives me hope that Taiwanese will one day succeed in establishing a country and join the international community.
Only then can we negotiate with other countries and safeguard our interests. Anything short of that is unconditional surrender.
Tony Chen
Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania
A Canadian alternative
The editorial on the problems Taiwanese companies have run into in China points to a very obvious fact ("We walk on thin ice in China," Sept. 5, page 8).
Bluntly put, my answer to this is, What in hell did you expect?
Instead, I would suggest Taiwan turn to the safest, most democratic and friendly country in the world: Canada.
Don Corrigan
Stoney Creek, Ontario";
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
Chinese intimidation of Taiwan has entered a chilling new phase: bolder, more multifaceted and unconstrained by diplomatic norms. For years, Taiwan has weathered economic coercion, military threats, diplomatic isolation, political interference, espionage and disinformation, but the direct targeting of elected leaders abroad signals an alarming escalation in Beijing’s campaign of hostility. Czech military intelligence recently uncovered a plot that reads like fiction, but is all too real. Chinese diplomats and civil secret service in Prague had planned to ram the motorcade of then-vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and physically assault her during her visit to the Czech Republic in March last
Cosmetics have long been one of the “golden pillars” of revenue for department stores in Taiwan. With rows of beauty counters and a full lineup of brands, they once served as a powerful draw for customers. However, since last year, the halo surrounding the sector has begun to fade. It is not an isolated issue affecting one retailer — it is a widespread phenomenon across department stores in Taiwan. Department store executives admit that business is tough, but they also stress that the root cause is not a drop in Taiwan’s spending power or a surge in outbound travel. Instead, a
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After