Ethnic politics has driven the nation's political evolution for the past two decades and is likely to be a deciding factor in the upcoming presidential election.
The notion of "Taiwanese being their own master," or "letting Taiwanese decide their future," constitutes the main element of ethnic campaigns in the country.
The first manifestation of ethnic politics was the first direct presidential election in 1996, when Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), an ethnic Taiwanese, was elected. Lee skillfully borrowed from the opposition Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) handling of ethnic issues and attempted to transform the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) into a "Taiwanese" political party. Since then, except for those who hold extreme pro-unification views, almost every politician has tried to some extent to embrace the concept of "Taiwanese identity" as a way to win votes.
Even though Lee's attempt failed when the KMT lost the 2000 presidential race, the so-called "Taiwan-centered consciousness" has gradually taken root, particularly after the DPP became the ruling party.
Therefore, it is not surprising to see KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
Ma's campaign strategy of riding a bike around the nation to experience "daily life in the country" by taking a so-called "long stay" was designed to strengthen his image of being truly Taiwanese and hopefully sway erstwhile DPP supporters.
Ma's campaign opens up a slew of interesting questions.
First, if the ethnic issue is not a problem as Ma insists, why would he need to spend so much time with everyday people?
Second, how accepting would Taiwanese voters -- or DPP voters for that matter -- of a non-ethnic Taiwanese president?
Third, can a "mainlander" like Ma -- who does not even speak fluent Taiwanese -- win enough support from light-green voters to win an election?
And finally, can Taiwanese voters select their next president without taking ethnicity into account?
These are the questions that have long dogged Ma's political career, although he says he has settled his own struggle with ethnic identity. It remains to be seen whether Ma is Taiwanese enough to win the election.
Ma finds himself walking a tightrope largely because he is not running purely as a representative of KMT supporters -- he also needs to win the backing of light-green and centrist voters. He faces the difficult task of needing to appeal to both of these groups while remaining true to himself and his party, which still advocates an ultimate unification with China.
Simply pretending to experience a day in the life of farmers and fishermen is not enough for Ma to win the hearts and minds of Taiwanese. It only shows Ma is still an outsider who does not speak the same language as voters outside Taipei.
Establishing a real connection with centrist voters entails more than just speaking Taiwanese and shaking hands with people in traditional markets -- it requires intimate exchanges of life experiences and thoughts. Such a connection requires long-time cultural interaction, rather than "short stay," cheap political stunts.
To effectively win over light-green voters, Ma has to prove the depth of his love for the nation and its people. He must prove that he is willing to make sacrifices for Taiwan. If Ma cannot safeguard the nation's sovereignty in the face of Beijing's diplomatic oppression, he is not qualified to become president. If Ma is only pretending to be interested in everyday people and the nation's sovereignty, he does not deserve to become president.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS