The Taipei District Court's verdict in the embezzlement trial of former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Before the prosecutors indicted him on Feb. 13 for embezzling NT$11 million (US$333,000) from his special mayoral allowance during his terms as Taipei mayor, Ma repeatedly said that the special allowance was for work-related expenditures and that he had spent it on work-related affairs or used it to make donations to charities. He acknowledged he fully understood how the allowance should be used.
"I did it all according to the law," Ma said at the time. "I am scrupulous in separating public matters from private matters."
But once the case entered the courtroom, Ma appeared to change his tune. He told the court that it was his understanding that the special mayoral allowance was for the mayor's private use.
Does he really believe people forget so easily?
After the final court hearing on Monday, Ma again proclaimed his innocence, but said that he had not understood the legalities of the special mayoral allowance because its guidelines were promulgated in 1952, implying that he was only two years old at the time.
What an original defense. It goes a long way in explaining why Ma has never passed a bar exam -- there are, after all, so many laws that were written and enacted before he was born or when he was a child.
If Ma's argument stands, then perhaps many people now serving time should be freed since many parts of the Criminal Code were promulgated in 1935, long before these offenders were born -- or even their parents.
It is probably a good thing that Ma was elected KMT chairman in 2005 so that he could offer the public a true test of his leadership abilities for them to scrutinize before elevating him to the Presidential Office.
And although Ma has often portrayed himself as a party reformer, he proved a major disappointment to those who had pinned their hopes on him to get the party to turn over a new leaf. During his brief stint as chairman, Ma not only failed to erase the party's "black gold" reputation by returning the party's stolen assets, the KMT sold several companies and pieces of property for more than NT$14 billion.
Instead of raising the party's standards, he agreed to the amendment of its "black gold" exclusion clause so he could still run for president even if found guilty of corruption in his first trial. The clause, which barred KMT members indicted for crimes from running for office, now only applies to indicted members who have lost their final court appeal.
"Nothing so conclusively proves a man's ability to lead others as what he does from day to day to lead himself," IBM founder Thomas John Watson once said.
By this standard, Ma has shown himself not only unable to govern himself and his party but also hardly to be the "Mr Clean" so many people would like to lead the country.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to