Sales of the central bank's certificates of deposit have never been so crucial to the nation's banking system as they are now.
Recently this has become a key issue in draining excess liquidity from the banking system to help stem inflation.
Normally, the central bank has sold 30-day, 91-day and 182-day certificates of deposit and negotiable certificates of deposit (NCDs) each day from Monday to Friday to help control short-term liquidity on the local money market.
On July 11, the central bank absorbed NT$73 billion in one-year redeposits from four state-run banks to help reduce excess funds in the banking system, only a week after it sold NT$98.17 billion (US$2.99 billion) in 364-day certificates of deposit and NCDs on July 4.
Last Thursday, however, the bank announced unexpectedly that it would double the size of 364-day certificates of deposit and NCDs for Friday's auction to NT$100 billion.
In a statement issued later the same day, the bank hinted it might move forward the date of its quarterly board meeting to handle changing conditions, indicating possible interest rate hikes.
Raising interest rates again? Not a big surprise. Most economists and fund managers anticipated that the central bank would raise rates again during its board meeting in September to continue narrowing the gap between the nation's borrowing costs and those of other countries.
Hinting at an extraordinary board meeting to review the effectiveness of monetary tools shows that the central bank senses the pressure at a time when high fuel costs and prices of wholesale raw materials have sparked concern that the situation could deteriorate into overall inflation.
In theory, raising interest rates will curb inflation and support the value of the NT dollar. Without doing so, funds will be drawn to push up the prices of local real estate, stocks and other assets. But the government needs to do more on this front, other than raising interest rates and supporting local currency.
The government must carefully analyze the causes of today's price problems without panicking and implementing measures in haste.
The government should examine whether the problem is restricted to certain sectors or has expanded to affect the economy as a whole. It must also look into whether the situation is being fueled by rising price levels for manufactured goods or by surging demand for primary commodities such as oil, metals and grains.
Developing a viable solution for a price spiral requires a clear understanding of whether the problem is produced domestically or is the result of international factors such as an unstable world market and rising inflation in other countries.
If the problem can be traced to hoarding by importers, the Fair Trade Commission and other government agencies must take measures to punish them and prevent further hoarding and abnormal price fluctuations.
But if the problem is caused by instabilities in the global market, such as recent problems with grain commodities and crude oil, calling for the government to provide price subsidies will only ease growing public anger in the short term.
In the long run it will distort market mechanisms and hurt the economy.
Whatever measures the government takes, both it and the public should realize that there is no cure-all for a complex problem related to many local and international factors.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
RSS