Taiwanese pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (
The TPP was created in July of 1927 during new national and international circumstances as a response to the breakup of the Taiwan Culture Association. Chiang resolutely overcame difficulties and divisions and established the first modern party in Taiwanese history for the benefit of the great majority of Taiwanese, who had been oppressed by the "two bright suns shining down on Taiwan": the development of the Japanese localization socialist movement and the progress of the Chinese modern nationalist revolutionary movement. He also established the organization in accordance with the multiple fronts that had developed in the resistance movement against the Japanese after the Taiwan Culture Association had split up. Gradually he established "a nationalist movement with the workers and peasant class as its foundation."
After three years and seven months of struggle, the TPP developed from a rather hopeless party to winning the trust and support of 4 million fellow Taiwanese, as well as the recognition of Japan, China and the international community. With natural enthusiasm and confidence, Chiang loftily stated: "Ideally, I hope that the TPP can become the party that is the leading organization of the liberation movement of the Taiwanese people." He believed that to achieve this goal, it had to "maintain its ideals, while focusing on reality."
This goal was far from being a fairy tale or an impossible mission. The national unity that Chiang created following the founding of the Taiwan Culture Association was similar to that of a previous movement -- the unity and strength created by Sun Yat-sen's (孫中山) Chinese nationalist revolution, which was still being felt.
Comparing the two leaders from an historical angle, we can see that the role Chiang played in Taiwan's modern civil movement was the same as Sun's in the modern nationalist revolution in China. Consequently, Chiang became "the Sun Yat-sen of Taiwan."
About 30 years ago, I was working 12 to 14 hours a day, researching and writing about this historical period. I was deeply moved by what I found. I learned about the lofty ideals, persistent determination and the high quality of our forefathers' style and ability. Yet most of this is ignored in modern Taiwan, forgotten by our forefathers' children and grandchildren.
On the one hand I was so touched by this history that I wanted to dance and cry at the same time. On the other hand I sighed deeply that most Taiwanese don't know about it. Restoring history and giving our forefathers their due became the most important motivation for me in those two years of tireless work.
Thirty years have passed and changes have been made in cross-strait relations and domestic politics. "Localization" and "creating a Taiwanese consciousness" have become popular political terminology. But 80 years ago, people with foresight like Chiang Wei-shui, with their wisdom and courage, were already on this turbulent piece of land, showing great moral courage, and writing beautiful, heroically tragic poetry.
In 1977, before the Kaohsiung Incident, Kang Ning-hsiang (康寧祥), one of the most important representatives of the dangwai (黨外, "outside the KMT"), said in a symposium that I hosted: "Chiang was a politician with much vigor and cordiality.
"He had charisma, his political movements were organized very well, he was resourceful and influential. I don't think any of the politicians that I have known in Taiwan in the past 80 years can compare to Chiang," he said.
In the past 100 years, three political leaders best represent their respective generations. Chiang is the forerunner of former president Lee Teng-hui (
Recently, the presidential candidates of the two big political parties, Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) for the Democratic Progressive Party and Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), engaged in a historical dialogue.
Under the shadow of Chiang, they looked down on history from a lofty angle, expounding on past and present, inheritance and their future vision. I hope this historical and political dialogue did not just show the style and qualities of the two presidential candidates, but can also help in improving domestic politics as well.
Huang Huang-hsiung is the founder of the Taiwan Research Fund and the chairman of the Chiang Wei-shui Foundation.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Chinese social media influencer “Yaya in Taiwan” (亞亞在台灣), whose real name is Liu Zhenya (劉振亞), made statements advocating for “reunifying Taiwan [with China] through military force.” After verifying that Liu did indeed make such statements, the National Immigration Agency revoked her dependency-based residency permit. She must now either leave the country voluntarily or be deported. Operating your own page and becoming an influencer require a certain amount of support and user traffic. You must successfully gain approval for your views and attract an audience. Although Liu must leave the country, I cannot help but wonder how many more “Yayas” are still
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
RSS