Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) announced he wants to continue President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) policies in the spirit of the New Partnership Agreement between the Indigenous Peoples and the Government of Taiwan. Hsieh's words were a great relief and an inspiration to people who have cared about the development of Aboriginal people for a long time. Yet there are still a few important issues that must be dealt with seriously.
The New Partnership Agreement echoes the ideas of the "New Partnerships -- Decade for Indigenous People" that the UN announced for 1994 to 2003. It was in this spirit that in 1999, when the presidential elections were drawing near, Aboriginal organizations sent a letter to the presidential candidates requesting them to sign the New Partnership Agreement. Only Chen was willing to sign, and in 2002 when he was president, he again acknowledged the agreement with representatives of all the Aboriginal tribes.
The basic spirit of the new partnership agreement is critical to ending the long term extermination and assimilation of indigenous people by foreign colonists. The agreement sought to reverse the Aboriginal position of being colonized, and avoid the passive acceptance of colonialist rule and the related assimilation policies.
As a spokesman for Aborigines, I shall explain the historical significance of the partnership, and interpret its content. The most basic content of the agreement is also the most important: Establishing a basic spirit of self-determination and promoting a movement for social reform of Aboriginal society.
Hsieh wants to continue a policy that is in accordance with Aboriginal rights. This is a much better approach than that of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who in his book Taiwan Spirit altogether avoids the long-term position of Aboriginal people. However, if the partnership agreement is not carried out and remains only on paper, then it will be a continuation and duplication of the time of the Japanese empire and the authoritarian KMT government, when the relationship between government and Aborigines was one between master and subordinate, like a "new ownership agreement."
Several cases related to Aboriginal autonomy and Aboriginal basic rights are worrying.
For example, there is the Tsou wild honey case, in which two Tsou men were accused of robbery after they confiscated wild honey that a Han man had obtained from Tsou property without permission of the Tsou community.
There is also the decline of the number of flying fish on Lanyu (
We hope that under the leadership of Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (張俊雄), we can at least establish an Aboriginal autonomous region, and that Chang makes this clear by signing the promises of the partnership.
We do know that the projects the partnership agreement aims to carry out are difficult and complicated. After all, liberation from centuries of hegemonic control is not something that can be accomplished overnight. With the current weak state of Aboriginal society this will be difficult.
The work of the decolonization of Aboriginal society has already started. We hope that the people that will be in charge after next year's elections can join an international progressive force, and continue to carry out a "new partnership" based on mutual respect, not a "new ownership."
Isak Afo is spokesperson of the Taiwan Indigenous Association.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
In November last year, a man struck a woman with a steel bar and killed her outside a hospital in China’s Fujian Province. Later, he justified his actions to the police by saying that he attacked her because she was small and alone, and he was venting his anger after a dispute with a colleague. To the casual observer, it could be seen as another case of an angry man gone mad for a moment, but on closer inspection, it reflects the sad side of a society long brutalized by violent political struggles triggered by crude Leninism and Maoism. Starting
The year 2020 will go down in history. Certainly, if for nothing else, it will be remembered as the year of the COVID-19 pandemic and the continuing impact it has had on the world. All nations have had to deal with it; none escaped. As a virus, COVID-19 has known no bounds. It has no agenda or ideology; it champions no cause. There is no way to bully it, gaslight it or bargain with it. Impervious to any hype, posturing, propaganda or commands, it ignores such and simply attacks. All nations, big or small, are on a level playing field
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s announcement on Saturday that the US was to drop self-imposed restrictions on meetings between senior Taiwanese and US officials had immediate real-world effects. On Monday, US Ambassador to the Netherlands Pete Hoekstra met Representative to the Netherlands Chen Hsing-hsing (陳欣新) at the US embassy in The Hague, with both noting on social media the historic nature of this seemingly modest event. Modest perhaps, but their meeting would have been impossible before Pompeo’s announcement. Some have welcomed this move, thinking that it is long-overdue and a step in the right direction to normalizing relations between
The US last week took action to remove most of the diplomatic red tape around US-Taiwan relations. While there have been adjustments in State Department “Guidelines on Relations with Taiwan” and other guidance before, no administration has ever so thoroughly dispensed with them. It is a step in the right direction. Of course, when there is a policy of formally recognizing one government (the People’s Republic of China or PRC) and not another (the Republic of China or ROC), officials from the top of government down need a systematic way of operationalizing the distinction. They cannot just make it up as