As evidenced by the development of Tainan City's Peiyuan military community in 1994 and Hsinchu City's festival for military communities across the nation in 1997, interest in military communities is strong around the country.
More recently, we have seen the making of a documentary on the demolition and relocation of 1 Air Force Community in Sanchong, a cultural festival for military communities around the nation in Taoyuan and the screening of Wang Wei-chung's (王偉忠) documentary about his mother and her daily life in a military community. These developments are all intended to educate the public about these communities and their cultural significance.
However, efforts to preserve the culture and history of military communities face challenges on two fronts: political and legal.
Politically speaking, a minority of people regard these communities as ghettos whose residents do not identify with Taiwan. Such individuals refuse to recognize the uniqueness and multicultural value of these communities. This reflects a misunderstanding of both people and history, as well as the conflict over national identity that has raged in recent years.
Simply put, the legal challenge to these communities is that existing legislation is insufficient. Crucially, military communities differ from the private or public buildings and sites mentioned in the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act (文化資產保護法). The ministry in charge of military communities is the Ministry of National Defense, whose primary interests in this regard are land development, capital allocation and the construction of new communities. The problem is that the officials in charge seem unwilling to preserve these cultural assets. The need to follow the law combined with inevitable inertia means that the unique military community culture will vanish as the government continues to demolish and reconstruct military communities.
Military communities are tangled up with the divisive issue of national identity, which results in problems that cannot easily be solved. However, common misunderstandings must be clarified. For example, in the past, these communities existed for the benefit of the dependents of military personnel. But today they are home to veterans. They have never been simply Mainlander households, as most are multicultural. The first generation of Mainlanders married across ethnic lines, as have later generations. The history of these communities is the history of first-generation Mainlanders forming families with Taiwanese residents and putting down roots here.
For most Taiwan-born descendants of Mainlanders, home is where their parents and grandparents live. The preservation of military community culture is the preservation of their homes and their memories of home. Faced with a cultural preservation project that may be politically controversial, we must take a broader view and not handle the issue based on narrow political interests.
To deal with the issue of insufficient legislation, the Association of Mainlander Taiwanese is working together with lawmakers from different political parties to push for the amendment of articles 1, 4 and 14 of the Act for Rebuilding Old Quarters for Military Dependents (國軍老舊眷村改建條例).
Military communities embody the lasting memories of many Mainlanders and Taiwanese mothers and their offspring. We call on the public to show greater tolerance and goodwill for the better of Taiwan's future, so that we can build a homeland for all of us.
Chang Mau-kuei is chairman of the Association of Mainlander Taiwanese.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With