What do "buy local first," a common slogan in the country, "recycling" and an expensive umbrella have in common?
When I was buying an umbrella sometime last year, the saleslady told me that Taiwan-made umbrellas were more expensive because of their quality and durability.
While I chose a cheaper umbrella then, I've since thought of what the salesperson said.
For years, "buy local first" has been viewed as an economically and politically driven slogan that would resurface once in a while as a boycott measure to counter unfair international treatment of Taiwan.
As the world is getting smaller, people are encouraged to take their role as global citizens more seriously to protect the environment and the concept of buying local products has taken on a different meaning.
As Slate magazine pointed out in its April 30 issue, food travels an average 1,500 miles (2,400km) before it's bought and eaten (slate.com/id/2164086).
In other words, imported fruits and vegetables add to the carbon-dioxide emissions that are detrimental to our health and environment.
While we strive to cut waste and save the environment by recycling, flying apples are working against this effort. For Taiwan, where agriculture development has yielded a wealth of produce, imported fruit is a luxury -- not a necessity.
The same goes for non-food items. If I were to spend a little more to buy a Taiwan-made umbrella, which is no longer the cheapest on the market but possibly one of the best, I would be saving on fuel while supporting the domestic economy.
Given a rapidly deteriorating environment, the question is not whether we should support small, divisive, individual governments, or the world, or both. A small switch in purchasing habits such as buying local products will do.
Yes, it is more expensive to buy an item that is made in Taiwan compared to one made in China. But in the long run, it means so much more. It encourages improvement of products and is less taxing on the environment.
In terms of produce, some may argue that it is easy for Taiwan not to import products because it has good, fertile land. I do believe that some places need imported food, but that is not true of all countries.
One can also argue that people had lived on much less just a century ago. We have been spoiled by science and technology beyond our own natural adaptability so that any inconvenience has become insufferable.
Being moral and responsible, as C.S. Lewis would put it, is not convenient and even less comfortable. At the age of taking a pill to numb the pain, it is perhaps wise to see what the pain is telling us.
Stephanie Lin
Taipei
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which